James Edmond, Inc. v. Schilling
| Decision Date | 31 October 1973 |
| Docket Number | No. 5287,5287 |
| Citation | 501 S.W.2d 432 |
| Parties | JAMES EDMOND, INC., Appellant, v. Earl SCHILLING, Appellee. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Durant, Mankoff, Davis & Wolens (C. Shwiff, Galloway & Noe (Marvin G. Shwiff), Dallas, for appellee.
This cause is before us on petition for writ of error to a $14,000 . default judgment rendered against petitioner in suit for asserted commissions due plus attorney's fees.
Plaintiff Schilling sued defendant Edmond, Inc., for $14,000. plus $5,000. attorney's fees for commissions assertedly due plaintiff for selling merchandise for defendant. Plaintiff served, or attempted to serve defendant by serving the Secretary of State of Texas under Article 2031b Vernon's Ann.Tex.Civ.St. The Secretary of State in turn forwarded the citation to defendant by certified mail, and it was returned 'Refused'. Defendant did not appear in the trial court in person or by attorney. Default judgment was rendered by the trial court against defendant for $10,500. commissions, and $3,500. for attorney's fees.
Defendant perfected its appeal by writ of error and relies on 6 points of error contending among other things:
1) The trial court erred in rendering default judgment against defendant in that there is nothing in the record which alleges or proves defendant is a foreign corporation subject to service of process under Article 2031b.
2) The trial court erred in rendering default judgment against defendant in that there is nothing in the record which alleges or proves defendant does not have a place of business in Texas, and thus subject to service of process under Article 2031b.
3) There is no record of any evidence which supports the unverified jurisdictional allegations of plaintiff or the judgment for commissions and attorney's fees.
We revert to contention 1 and 2 above.
Section 2, Article 2031b provides: 'When any foreign corporation * * * shall engage in business in this State * * * service may be made by serving a copy of the process with the person who * * * is in charge of any business in which defendant (is) engaged * * *'.
Section 3, Article 2031b provides: 'Any foreign corporation * * * that engages in business in this State * * * and does not maintain a place of regular business in this State or a designated agent upon whom service may be made * * * the act or acts of engaging in such business * * * shall be deemed equivalent to an appointment * * * of the Secretary of State of Texas as agent upon whom service of process may be made * * *'.
Plaintiff did not allege that defendant was a 'foreign corporation'; and did not allege that it 'does not maintain a place of regular business in this State'; and there is no evidence or finding that defendant is a foreign corporation, or that it did not maintain a place of regular business in this State.
Where service is under Article 2031b () it is imperative that the record affirmatively show a strict compliance with the provided mode of service. And while ordinarily presumptions are made in support of a judgment (including presumptions of due service of citation when the judgment so recites), no such presumptions are made in a direct attack upon a default judgment. McKanna v. Edgar, Tex.Sup., 388 S.W.2d 927; Roberts Corp. v. Austin Co., CCA, NRE,487 S.W.2d 165.
Thus plaintiff's petition must contain an allegation that defendant is a 'foreign corporation'; as well...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Thomas
...(Tex.Comm'n App.1936, opinion adopted); Goodin v. Geller, 521 S.W.2d 158 (Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1975, writ ref'd n.r.e.); James Edmond, Inc. v. Schilling, 501 S.W.2d 432 (Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1973, no writ); Waller v. O'Rear, 472 S.W.2d 789 (Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1971, writ ref'd n.r.e); State v. R......
-
Booker v. Hill, 5912
...presumptions are made in a direct attack upon a default judgment. McKanna v. Edgar, Tex.S.Ct., 388 S.W.2d 927; Edmond, Inc. v. Schilling, Tex.Civ.App. (Waco) NWH, 501 S.W.2d 432; Flynt v. City of Kingsville, 125 Tex. 510, 82 S.W.2d Defendant's contentions, supra, are sustained. The trial co......
-
Morgan Exp., Inc. v. Elizabeth-Perkins, Inc.
...(Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1975, no writ); Dugie v. Dugie, 511 S.W.2d 623, 624 (Tex. Civ.App.--San Antonio 1974, no writ); James Edmond, Inc. v. Schilling, 501 S.W.2d 432, 434 (Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1973, no In the absence of any expression by the Supreme Court, we must choose between these divergent......
-
Silverstein v. Natkin, 5975
...Victory v. Hamilton, 127 Tex. 203, 91 S.W.2d 697; Gibbs v. Crittenden, (Tex.Civ.App., Waco) NWH, 262 S.W.2d 804; Edmond v. Schilling, (Tex.Civ.App., Waco) NWH, 501 S.W.2d 432; Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Burgess, (Tex.Civ.App., Amarillo) Er.Ref., 118 S.W.2d 1100; Waller v. O'Rear, (Tex.Civ.A......