James v. State

Decision Date10 April 1978
Citation385 A.2d 725
PartiesThomas C. JAMES, Defendant below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff below, Appellee.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Delaware

Upon appeal from Superior Court.

Reversed and remanded.

Nancy Jane Mullen, Asst. Public Defender, Wilmington, for defendant below, appellant.

Francis A. Reardon, Deputy Atty. Gen., Wilmington, for plaintiff below, appellee.

Before HERRMANN, C. J., and DUFFY and McNEILLY, JJ.

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

In this appeal from denial by the Superior Court of a petition for writ of habeas corpus, the question is whether the Correctional Authorities may administratively change the expiration date of the sentence of a prisoner, as the result of an escape.

I.

The defendant was sentenced to a term of 5 years imprisonment for robbery, the sentence to commence on March 23, 1972 and end on March 22, 1977.

On September 1, 1972, the defendant allegedly escaped from the custody of the Department of Corrections; he was returned to custody on April 8, 1976. Upon being indicted for escape, the defendant was tried but found not guilty on the ground that the charge was barred by the statute of limitations. 1

Upon the defendant's return to the custody of the Department of Corrections, his 5 year sentence was recomputed by the Correctional Authorities and the maximum expiration of the sentence was administratively extended by 3 years, 6 months, and 17 days the period of time during which the defendant had allegedly been an "escapee". The new sentence expiration date so set was October 8, 1980.

Following the passage of the original sentence expiration date of March 22, 1977, the defendant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that his detention beyond that date, by administrative act, was unlawful. The Superior Court denied the writ on the ground that an order entered by a Judge of the Superior Court in State v. Quinn, Del.Super., 1301 Cr.A. 1971 and 1647 Cr.A. 1971 (2/27/76) 2 was, in effect, a general judicial order to correctional authorities to administratively extend the sentences of escapees by the period of their escapes; and that prisoners challenging the recomputation of their sentences as a result of an escape could obtain a judicial review of the recomputation by petition for habeas corpus or motion for correction of sentence.

II.

The Judges of this State are required by Statute to state the dates of commencement and termination of a sentence. 11 Del.C. § 3901(a). 3 Such judicial act may not be altered administratively. We hold that the reforming of a Superior Court sentence, after return from an escape, remains a judicial function which may not be delegated by the Court to be performed administratively by the Correctional Authorities. This ruling is consistent with the view expressed by this Court in Frye v. State, Del.Supr., 236 A.2d 424, 425 (1967): "We note with approval the statement * * * of the Superior Court * * * that, in the future, in similar circumstances (of escape), the extension of termination dates will be by action of the Superior Court rather than by mere refusal to release by the Correctional Authorities."

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Radulski for Taylor v. Delaware State Hosp. for and on Behalf of Div. of Alcoholism, Drug Abuse and Mental Health, of Dept. of Health and Social Services
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Delaware
    • April 22, 1988
    ...or assumed sua sponte by the Hospital. 16 Del.C. §§ 5011-5012. Cf. In re Lewis, Del.Supr., 403 A.2d 1115, 1120 (1979); James v. State, Del.Supr., 385 A.2d 725, 727 (1978). In this case, the Hospital failed to follow two separate and distinct statutory mandates. First, the purported waiver w......
  • Faircloth v. State
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Delaware
    • February 18, 1987
    ...and the date of termination of Faircloth's sentence. Faircloth's argument finds support in this Court's decision in James v. State, Del.Supr., 385 A.2d 725 (1978). However, James presented an unusual factual situation. In James, following an escape, the defendant was tried but found not gui......
  • Hall v. Carr
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Delaware
    • March 17, 1997
    ...III probation before Hall served the remainder of the parole term associated with his level V prison sentence. See James v. State, Del.Supr., 385 A.2d 725, 727 (1978). Thus, the Superior Court's action in July 1992 reducing Hall's Level III probation to Level II probation was premature beca......
  • Brown v. State
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Delaware
    • March 11, 2002
    ...§ 3901(c). 3. State v. Brown, Del.Super., No. 9801000652 (Aug. 8, 2001). 4. Del.Code Ann. tit. 11, § 3901(a) (2001). 5. James v. State, 385 A.2d 725, 727 (Del. 1978); see Faircloth v. State, 522 A.2d 1268, 1270-71 (Del.1987). 6. James v. State, 385 A.2d at 727. 7. Id. 8. See Del.Code Ann. t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT