Jamison v. Culligan
| Decision Date | 14 June 1899 |
| Citation | Jamison v. Culligan, 151 Mo. 410, 52 S.W. 224 (Mo. 1899) |
| Parties | JAMISON v. CULLIGAN et ux. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Jackson county; John W. Henry, Judge.
Action by Robert R. Jamison, administrator, against Edmund Culligan and Margaret Culligan. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
A. M. Allen and W. F. Allen, for appellant. C. H. Nearing, for respondents.
This suit was commenced by Jeremiah Collins and Martha, his wife, as plaintiffs. Martha died, and afterwards Jeremiah died. Jamison was appointed administrator of Jeremiah's estate, and the suit was revived in his name as sole plaintiff. The administrator filed an amended petition, in three counts, which, omitting descriptions of land, is as follows: ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Hernandez v. Banks
...Co., 137 Mich. 309, 100 N.W. 569, 571–72 (1904); Schultz v. Oldenburg, 202 Minn. 237, 277 N.W. 918, 921 (1938); Jamison v. Culligan, 151 Mo. 410, 52 S.W. 224, 225 (1899); Sawtelle v. Tatone, 105 N.H. 398, 201 A.2d 111, 115 (1964); Robinson v. Kind, 25 Nev. 261, 62 P. 705, 705 (1900); Blinn ......
-
State ex rel. United Mut. Ins. Ass'n v. Shain
...the United Commercial Travelers of America v. Shain, 339 Mo. 903, 98 S.W.2d 597; McKenzie v. Donnell, 151 Mo. 461, 52 S.W. 222; Jamison v. Culligan, 151 Mo. 410; Wells v. Mutual Benefit Assn., 126 Mo. Wiggington v. Burns, 216 S.W. 756. (2) In holding that the giving of relator's Instruction......
-
Byers v. Security Beneficiary Soc. of Topeka, Kan.
...consideration and without knowledge of insanity, it shall not be set aside. Doty v. Mumma, 305 Mo. 188, 264 S.W. 656; Jamison v. Culligan, 151 Mo. 410, 52 S.W. 224. (b) Plaintiff made no offer or attempt to place the in status quo, a condition precedent to setting aside a contract. Wells v.......
-
Smith v. Wallace
... ... jury and the judgment rendered thereon cannot stand ... Hoffman v. Bigham, 24 S.W.2d 132; Jamison v ... Culligan, 151 Mo. 410. (4) The court erred in failing ... and refusing to give appellants' instructions in the ... nature of a demurrer to ... ...