Jamison v. State, 90-2514

Decision Date31 July 1991
Docket NumberNo. 90-2514,90-2514
Citation583 So.2d 413
PartiesWillie JAMISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. 583 So.2d 413, 16 Fla. L. Week. D2004
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dawn S. Wynn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant's conviction and sentence as a habitual offender. We reject appellant's contention that chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, amending section 775.084, Florida Statutes, violates the single subject rule of article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution. E.g., Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla.1990).

HERSEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 15, 1991
    ...section 775.084, does not violate the single subject rule of Article III, section 6, Florida Constitution. See Jamison v. State, 583 So.2d 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); McCall v. State, 583 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). We find it unnecessary to address appellant's other constitutional challeng......
  • State v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 14, 1993
    ...single subject rule of article III, section 6, of the Florida Constitution. 1 The district court acknowledged conflict with Jamison v. State, 583 So.2d 413 (4th DCA), rev. denied, 591 So.2d 182 (Fla.1991), and McCall v. State, 583 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), 2 and certified the following......
  • Van Bryant v. State, 91-2057
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 27, 1992
    ...single subject rule. See McCall v. State, 583 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), juris. accepted, 593 So.2d 1052 (Fla.1992); Jamison v. State, 583 So.2d 413 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 591 So.2d 182 (Fla.1991). Appellant could have been habitualized as a habitual violent felony offender under ......
  • Beaubrum v. State, 90-2763
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 10, 1992
    ...attempted first degree murder and armed robbery counts. There is no constitutional violation of the one subject rule. Jamison v. State, 583 So.2d 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); rev. denied, 591 So.2d 182 (Fla.1991); McCall v. State, 583 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) rev. granted, 17 F.L.W. No. 7,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT