Jarrard v. Southeastern Shipbuilding Corporation
| Decision Date | 04 November 1947 |
| Docket Number | No. 12001.,12001. |
| Citation | 163 F.2d 960 |
| Parties | JARRARD et al. v. SOUTHEASTERN SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Joseph M. Smith and Perry Brannen, both of Savannah, Ga., for appellants.
E. Ormonde Hunter, of Sanvannah, Ga., for appellee.
Before HUTCHESON, McCORD, and WALLER, Circuit Judges.
Appellants seek to recover liquidated damages pursuant to section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S. C.A. § 216(b). They allege that they were original parties or intervenors in a class action brought in the Superior Court of Chatham County, Georgia; that by agreement of record in that court, and decree thereon, appellee paid to appellants certain amounts alleged to be due them as overtime compensation under the Act, but the decree failed to award liquidated damages as provided in Section 16(b), and that under the foregoing provision they are entitled to recover such damages here.
Much difficulty was encountered by the parties in ascertaining the amount of compensable overtime, and the employees entitled to pay for same. It was shown that the number of employees who failed to work and who were late each work day was not known, and even the petition failed to give this information. The Georgia court found, from an examination and study of the pleadings and from the statements of witnesses for both the plaintiffs and defendant, that a bona fide dispute of both law and fact was involved in the litigation, and that the proposed settlement agreed upon was fair and equitable to all parties concerned. The Georgia court went further and decreed: "That the defendant is hereby ordered to pay and the plaintiffs and interveners are hereby ordered to accept the following sums in full settlement of all claims and demands of every kind and character whatsoever that the plaintiffs and interveners and each of them have or may claim to have against the defendant arising out of or in any way connected with the Fair Labor Standards Act or this proceeding, from the time of their employment with the Company up to the present date, * * *". This decree, based on the stipulation agreement, was entered as a final judgment in the case.
The defendant entered a plea of res judicata in the court below, on the ground that appellants' rights had been previously adjudicated by the decree of the Chatham County Superior Court. This plea was sustained, and appellants were dismissed as parties plaintiff. This appeal is taken from that action.
We are of opinion that the sustaining of defendant's plea of res judicata was correct. It is well settled that a final judgment or decree on the merits in the courts of a state is conclusive in the federal courts, whether the question determined is one of federal, general, or local law. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Blue, 4 Cir., 202 F. 82; United States v. Eisenbeis, 9 Cir., 112 F. 190, 195; Fauntleroy v. Lum, 210 U.S. 230, 28 S.Ct. 641, 52 L.Ed. 1039; City of Boston v. McGovern, 1 Cir., 292 F. 705, 706; Morel v. Harry Thoens & Co., D.C., 63 F. Supp. 188.
The plaintiffs had the option to sue either in the state or federal court. They were permitted to choose their forum, and they elected to bring their suit in the state court of Georgia. Adair v. Traco, Division 192 Ga. 59, 14 S.E.2d 466; Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Hargrave, 10 Cir., 129 F.2d 655, 656. Having made their election th...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
EB Elliott Adv. Co. v. Metropolitan Dade County
...122; Hudson v. Lewis, 5 Cir. 1951, 188 F.2d 679; Iselin v. C. W. Hunter Co., 5 Cir. 1949, 173 F.2d 388; Jarrard v. Southeastern Shipbuilding Corporation, 5 Cir. 1947, 163 F.2d 960; Thompson v. Houston Oil Co., 5 Cir. 1930, 37 F.2d 687. 28 U.S.C. § 1738 (1948). However, it is equally element......
-
Collins v. Sanderson Farms, Inc., Civil Action No. 06-2946.
...scrutinizing the settlement for fairness." Id, at 1353 (citing Gangi, 328 U.S. 108, 66 S.Ct. 925, and Jarrard v. Southeastern Shipbuilding Corp., 163 F.2d 960, 961 (5th Cir.1947)). In order to approve a settlement proposed by an employer and employees of a suit brought under the FLSA and en......
-
St. John v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board
...of that state would give to it. Covington v. First National Bank, 198 U.S. 100, 25 S.Ct. 562, 49 L.Ed. 963; Jarrard v. Southeastern Shipbuilding Corporation, 5 Cir., 163 F.2d 960. In the instant case, we must consider the judgment which is pleaded in bar in the light in which it should be c......
-
Altier v. Worley Catastrophe Response, LLC
...over an FLSA provision and (2) the settlement is fair and reasonable. Lynn's Food Stores, 679 F.2d at 1352-55; Jarrad v. S. Shipbldg. Corp., 163 F.2d 960, 960 (5th Cir. 1947); Domingue, 2010 WL 1688793, at *1 (citing Lynn's Food Stores, 679 F.2d at 1355); Liger v. New Orleans Hornets NBA Lt......
-
Wages, Hours, and Overtime
...2011) (citing cases); Lynn’s Food Stores v. United States , 679 F.2d 1350 (11th Cir. 1982); Jarrard v. Southeastern Shipbuilding Corp. , 163 F.2d 960 (5th Cir. 1947); D.A. Schulte, Inv. v. Gangi , 328 U.S. 108 (1946) (dicta). d. d aMagEs and P EnaLtiEs 1. Back Wages and Liquidated Damages T......
-
Wages, Hours, and Overtime
...2011) (citing cases); Lynn’s Food Stores v. United States , 679 F.2d 1350 (11th Cir. 1982); Jarrard v. Southeastern Shipbuilding Corp. , 163 F.2d 960 (5th Cir. 1947); D.A. Schulte, Inv. v. Gangi , 328 U.S. 108 (1946) (dicta). D. Dൺආൺൾඌ ൺඇൽ Pൾඇൺඅඍංൾඌ 1. Back Wages and Liquidated Damages The......
-
Wages, hours, and overtime
...2011) (citing cases); Lynn’s Food Stores v. United States , 679 F.2d 1350 (11th Cir. 1982); Jarrard v. Southeastern Shipbuilding Corp. , 163 F.2d 960 (5th Cir. 1947); D.A. Schulte, Inv. v. Gangi , 328 U.S. 108 (1946) (dicta). D. Damages and Penalties 1. Back Wages and Liquidated Damages The......
-
Wages, Hours, and Overtime
...Lynn’s Food Stores v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350 (11th Cir. 1982); Jarrard v. Southeastern §9:1 Texas Employment Law Shipbuilding Corp., 163 F.2d 960 (5th Cir. 1947); Schulte, Inv. v. Gangi, 328 U.S. 108 (1946) (dicta). D. Damages and Penalties 1. Back Wages and Liquidated Damages The FLS......