Jarrett v. Northcutt
| Decision Date | 19 December 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. B-8856,B-8856 |
| Citation | 592 S.W.2d 930 |
| Parties | Mary Lou Northcutt JARRETT, Petitioner, v. Pat L. NORTHCUTT, Respondent. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Smith, Baker, Field & Clifford, Galey & Cummings, Charles E. Galey, Lubbock, for petitioner.
Bowers, Cotten & Harland, Forrest Bowers, Lubbock, for respondent.
Mary Lou Northcutt Jarrett brought a bill of review action to set aside the property settlement rendered in a prior divorce from her ex-husband, Pat Northcutt. The trial court rendered judgment for Mrs. Jarrett in the bill of review action and ordered a substantial redivision of the property. The court of civil appeals reversed that judgment. 585 S.W.2d 874. In reversing, that court held that Mrs. Jarrett had failed to prove a necessary element of her bill of review. She did not establish that she was without fault or negligence in allowing the prior judgment to become final. The court of civil appeals held that she was required to prove her lack of negligence, in spite of the fact that her waiver of process was invalidly executed. In this regard, the decision of the court of civil appeals conflicts with the decision of the court of civil appeals in Deen v. Deen, 530 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.Civ.App. Fort Worth 1975, no writ).
We conclude that, in order to prevail, the plaintiff in a bill of review action must prove his/her lack of fault or negligence in permitting a meritorious defense to go unasserted in a prior action. Cf. McEwen v. Harrison, 162 Tex. 125, 345 S.W.2d 706, 710 (1961). Accordingly, we disapprove of the holding of Deen v. Deen, supra. The application for writ of error in this case is refused, no reversible error. Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State Nat. Bank of El Paso v. Farah Mfg. Co., Inc.
...case could be properly submitted. See: Northcutt v. Jarrett, 585 S.W.2d 874 (Tex.Civ.App.--Amarillo) writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 592 S.W.2d 930 (Tex.1979). We next determine that the merits of the point were not waived and should be considered. Rule 277, Tex.R.Civ.P. Having considered the......
-
Rodriguez v. Holmstrom
...case therein resulted from the negligence, inadvertence or mistake of either the party seeking relief or his counsel. Jarrett v. Northcutt, 592 S.W.2d 930 (Tex.1979); Johnson v. Potter, 384 S.W.2d 747 (Tex.Civ.App.-Tyler 1964, no writ); Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Pribble, 130 S.W.2d......
-
Narvaez v. Maldonado
...from fault or negligence in failing to assert his meritorious defense—the third element of a bill of review. See Jarrett v. Northcutt, 592 S.W.2d 930, 930-31 (Tex.1979) (bill of review complainant whose waiver of process in the prior suit was improperly executed was nevertheless required to......
-
Harrell v. Harrell
...division portion of a divorce decree. Ragsdale v. Ragsdale, 520 S.W.2d 839 (Tex.Civ.App.--Fort Worth 1975, no writ); see Jarrett v. Northcutt, 592 S.W.2d 930 (Tex.1980). "A bill of review is an equitable proceeding designed to prevent manifest injustice." French v. Brown, 424 S.W.2d 893 (Te......