Jasper Land Co. v. City of Jasper

Decision Date27 March 1930
Docket Number6 Div. 504.
Citation127 So. 210,220 Ala. 639
PartiesJASPER LAND CO. v. CITY OF JASPER ET AL.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Walker County; R. L. Blanton, Judge.

Bill in equity by the Jasper Land Company against the City of Jasper and the officials thereof, to vacate street improvement assessment proceedings, etc. From a decree sustaining a demurrer to the bill, complainant appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Arthur Fite and Coleman D. Shepherd, both of Jasper, for appellant.

Chas R. Wiggins and J. J. Curtis, both of Jasper, for appellees.

BOULDIN J.

A bill in equity was filed to vacate proceedings of municipal authorities purporting to make a local assessment for street improvement against the property of complainant and to enjoin the issuance of bonds against such assessment. The appeal is from a decree sustaining a demurrer to the bill.

Among the grounds of attack made in the bill is: That while notice was published pursuant to Code, § 2192, showing the assessment roll required by Code, §§ 2190 and 2191, had been delivered to the city clerk and was open for inspection in his office, in fact no such assessment roll had been made and delivered to the clerk prior to the day set for hearing of objections by property owners, and on which day the assessment was made final.

Proceedings to make local assessments fastening a lien on specific property for the amount so assessed are judicial in character. While proceedings in rem, due process of law must be observed.

Under our system the assessment roll open to inspection for the purpose of preparing proper objections for the hearing is a part of the notice itself. The published notice gives no advice as to the amount of the assessment, the description of the property, etc., but refers the owner to the source of information prescribed by statute.

Notice in substantial conformity to law is regarded as jurisdictional. So, if the data referred to as a basis of notice does not exist, is not delivered so as to become available until the day of hearing, we are constrained to hold there is a failure of statutory notice; and the assessment is void for want of jurisdiction. Day v. City of Montgomery, 209 Ala. 609, 96 So. 894; Id., 207 Ala 644, 93 So. 609; 44 C.J. p. 706, § 3189; Lyon v Alley, 130 U.S. 177, 9 S.Ct. 480, 32 L.Ed. 899.

A void assessment casting a cloud upon title may be enjoined and vacated in equity, no adequate remedy at law appearing. Alabama City v. Alabama Power Co., 213 Ala. 644, 106 So. 39; Board of Com'rs of City of Mobile v. Moore, 214 Ala. 525, 108 So. 568; 44 C.J. p. 755, § 3305; Prudential Casualty Co. v. Kerr, 202 Ala. 259, 80 So. 97; Rice v. Tobias, 89 Ala. 214, 7 So. 765; Brock v. Decatur, 185 Ala. 146, 64 So. 73.

A recital, in the judgment or order making the assessment final, that the assessment roll was delivered to the clerk as per notice, while presumed to be true, is not conclusive in a direct proceeding by bill in equity challenging the jurisdiction of the board; no rights of third persons having intervened. Wise v. Miller, 215 Ala. 660, 111 So. 913; 1 Black, § 288; 34 C.J. p. 550, note 35.

In the absence of such notice as required by law, the failure to file objections to the proposed assessment creates no estoppel under Code, § 2196. That statute, giving a failure to file objections the effect of consent to the proposed assessment, implies that due opportunity has been given to present objections as prescribed by law.

But unless there was a want of legal notice,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • City of Jasper v. Sanders
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 26, 1933
    ...no relation to such special benefits, but were levied on a yardage basis as indicated by the engineer. It was declared in Jasper Land Co. v. City of Jasper, supra, the required assessment roll made, filed, and open to inspection for the purpose of giving the parties in interest an opportuni......
  • Ex parte Finley
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • December 14, 1944
    ... ... [20 So.2d 99] ... Geo ... D. Finley, of Tarrant City, for petitioners ... Graham, ... Bibb & Wingo, of Birmingham, ... [20 So.2d 100] ... strip of land to said city for use as a street, in ... consideration for which the city ... v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co., 222 Ala. 155, 161, 131 So ... 14; Jasper Land Co. v. City of Jasper, 220 Ala. 639, ... 127 So. 210; City of Jasper ... ...
  • Grayson v. Schwab
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 13, 1938
    ...observed, no other evidence of them was necessary, since the statute has not specified how such facts should be shown. And in Jasper Land Co. v. Jasper, supra, we held that such recital in the assessment ordinance was presumed to be true, though not conclusive on direct attack. Those princi......
  • Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v. City of Florala, Ala.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Alabama
    • August 25, 1931
    ...mere collateral attacks against the adjudication already made by the municipal authority, and cannot be made here. Jasper Land Co. v. City of Jasper, 220 Ala. 639, 127 So. 210; Grant v. City of Birmingham, 210 Ala. 239, page 241, 97 So. 731 at page 732, and cases there cited; Duval Cattle C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT