Jefferson Realty Co. v. Emp. Liability Cor.
Decision Date | 10 October 1912 |
Citation | 149 Ky. 741 |
Parties | Jefferson Realty Company v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Second Division).
WILLIAM M. WATTS, FRED FORCHT, JR., for appellant.
O'NEAL & O'NEAL for appellee.
In the Paul Jones Building, located in Louisville, and owned by the appellant realty company, there are four passenger elevators. The realty company took out insurance to protect itself from loss on account of accidents happening to passengers on two of these elevators in the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, and on two of them in the appellee assurance corporation. In February, 1909, T. M. Berry, a passenger, while using one of these elevators was seriously injured. Under the mistaken impression that the injury occurred in one of the elevators covered by the policy in the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, that company was at once notified of the accident by the realty company and without stopping to ascertain whether the accident occurred on an elevator insured by it, at once took such action as it deemed advisable to protect its interests. About a month after the accident, and in March, 1909, Berry brought suit against the realty company to recover damages for the injuries sustained in the accident, and the attorneys for the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, yet laboring under the belief that it was liable under its policy, undertook the defense of the case and continued in charge of it until January, 1910, the case not having been brought to a trial before this date. In January, 1910, it was discovered that the accident occurred in one of the elevators covered by the policy of the appellee company, and not the policy of the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York; and, upon making this discovery, the appellee company was at once notified and placed in possession of all of the information that had been collected by the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York. But, taking the position that it was not liable because of the delay in giving it information of the accident and the institution of the suit it declined to have anything to do with the suit brought by Berry. This suit, however, was settled between the realty company and Berry, a short time after this, by the payment to Berry of $2,500 and costs, the appellee company not objecting to the settlement, although denying its liability. After making the settlement, this action was brought by the realty company against the appellee company to recover from it the amount paid to Berry. The petition set up the facts before mentioned, and also the conditions of the policy upon which it rested its cause of action. To this petition a general demurrer was sustained, and declining to plead further the action of the realty company was dismissed, and it prosecutes this appeal.
The policy issued by the appellee company stipulated that it would indemnify the insured against loss, subject to certain conditions, among which were these:
To defeat the action, the appellee company relied upon these conditions, although it did not insist that under them it was entitled to immediate notice, only claiming that it was entitled to reasonable notice of the accident and reasonable notice of the institution of the action by Berry. On the other hand, the realty company seeks to avoid this defense upon the following grounds which we take from its petition:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Berg v. Associated Employers' Reciprocal
... ... INSURANCE-CONDITION ... OF INSURER'S LIABILITY-COMPLIANCE-CORPORATIONS-OFFICERS ... OUT OF STATE-SERVICE ... Co., 51 Cal.App ... 246, 196 P. 796; Jefferson Realty Co. v. Employers' ... Liability Assur. Corp., 149 ... ...
-
Harmon v. Farm Bureau Auto. Ins. Co.
... ... case was an action by assured under an automobile liability policy to recover attorney's fees incurred by him in ... 268, 100 A. 572; Jefferson Realty Co ... ...