Jefferson v. Southern Railway In Mississippi
Decision Date | 14 July 1913 |
Citation | 62 So. 643,105 Miss. 571 |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Parties | FRANK JEFFERSON et al. v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY IN MISSISSIPPI |
March 1913
APPEAL from the circuit court of Sunflower county, HON. J. M CASHIN, Judge.
Suit by Frank Jefferson and another against the Southern Railway in Mississippi. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.
The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
Reversed and remanded.
Chapman & Williams and Whitfield, McNeil & Whitfield, attorneys for appellant.
Catchings & Catchings, attorneys for appellee.
Appellants instituted this suit in the court below to recover of appellee damages for the death of Anna Jefferson, the wife of one and the mother of the other of appellants, who they allege was struck and killed by one of appellee's trains. At the close of the evidence the jury, at the request of appellee, was instructed to find for it, and there was a verdict and judgment accordingly.
Appellants rested their case, after making out a prima facie case of negligence under the statute, by showing that Anna was found dead early one morning between the rails of appellee's railroad, at a curve in the track, with a wound in her head and one of her feet cut off. To meet this prima facie case, appellee introduced evidence showing that three of its trains passed over the track at the place where, and on the morning that, Anna was killed; that she was probably struck by the one of which a man by the name of Murff was the engineer. Murff was then introduced, and testified that his train passed the place where Anna was killed between 4:45 and five o'clock a m.; that he was on the lookout and did not see her, and was not aware that she had been struck until some hours thereafter. He was then asked and answered the following questions: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hinds v. Moore
...this burden, the appellees were entitled to a peremptory instruction. Railroad Co. v. Cole, 101 Miss. 173, 57 So. 556; Jefferson v. R. R. Co., 105 Miss. 571, 62 So. 643; R. R. Co. v. Thornhill, 106 387, 63 So. 674; R. R. Co., v. Gray, 79 So. 812; R. R. Co. v. Roberson, 106 Miss. 896, 64 So.......
-
Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. v. Coleman
...So. 617; Fuller v. I. C. R. R. Co., 100 Miss. 705, 56 So. 783; N. & N.E. R. R. Co. v. Cole, 101 Miss. 175, 57 So. 556; Jefferson v. So. Ry. Co., 105 Miss. 571, 62 So. 643. underlying reasonableness of both statutes is the same. The railroad prima-facie statute was passed, upsetting the time......
-
Hamel v. Southern Ry. Co. in Mississippi
...Railroad Company v. Cole, 57 Miss. 556; Crawford v. Railroad Company, 59 So. 86; Fuller v. Railroad Company, 100 Miss. 705; Jefferson v. So. Ry. Co., 62 So. 643; Railroad Company v. Carney, 68 So. The court will notice that instructions Numbers five, six, and seven, asked by the plaintiff, ......
-
Austin v. Mobile & O. R. Co
... ... Swan's case, supra; Mississippi Central Railway ... Company v. A. T. Mason, 51 Miss. 234; Myers et al. v ... Co. v. Daniel, 66 So ... 730; Offett v. Barrett, 63 So. 333; Jefferson et ... al. v. Southern Ry. Co., 62 So. 643; Fuller v. I. C ... Ry. Co., ... ...