Jergens v. Stanley, 36984
| Decision Date | 29 April 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 36984,36984 |
| Citation | 277 S.E.2d 651,247 Ga. 543 |
| Parties | JERGENS et al. v. STANLEY, Comm., et al. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
J. Britten Miller, Jr., Marietta, for Lonnie Jergens et al.
Oliver Harris Doss, Jr., County Atty., Blue Ridge, for Richard Stanley, Comr., et al.
Plaintiffs are the owners of a tract of land in Fannin County. An unpaved road crosses plaintiffs' land. The road begins at a public way known as Doublehead Gap Road, passes over an adjoining tract of land, then plaintiffs' land, and terminates at the boundary of yet another tract. The length of the road is less than a mile. Plaintiffs purchased their property in 1977. 1
In this action plaintiffs object to county maintenance of the road and a certain bridge where the road crosses over Skeenah Creek. Plaintiffs contend the road is private and the defendant county commissioners contend it is public. Following a confrontation between the parties, the plaintiffs filed this action seeking to have the county commissioners enjoined from entry upon and maintenance of the road within the boundaries of plaintiffs' tract of land. A temporary restraining order issued, followed by a hearing before the court on the question of injunction. This question turns entirely upon whether the road is public or private. The trial court found the road to be public, dissolved the temporary restraining order, and denied the injunction.
The trial court made findings of fact including the following: The road has existed for many years, perhaps dating from as far back as 1928. It was a roadway leading to the Chattahoochee National Forest. A former county commissioner testified that, during his term of office from 1957 to 1969, the county worked the road twice a year as had been done in years before his time in office. Another former county commissioner, 1969-1976, testified he knew the road well and that the public had used it for as long as he had known the road. Numbers of times he scraped and gravelled the road and repaired the bridge. Others testified as to the county maintenance of the road and use of the road by the public from the present, as far back as the 1950's. On the other hand, witnesses for the plaintiffs testified that one of the landowners built the bridge over Skeenah Creek. Other landowners spent considerable sums of money maintaining the bridge and road. It was found by the trial court that, until now, no one ever complained of the fact that the county maintained the road and bridge. The only complaints were that the county did not work the road enough.
By dedication one may give a right to the public to use his land. Code Ann. § 85-410. The code provision does not define dedication. This court has defined the term on numerous occasions. A frequently cited opinion is that written by Justice Cobb in Healey v. City of Atlanta, 125 Ga. 736, 54 S.E. 749 (1906). The two basic requirements of dedication of property to public use are, (1) an intention by the owner to dedicate the land to public use, and (2) an acceptance thereof by the public. The intention to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Bowen v. Savoy
-
Postnieks v. Chick-Fil-a, Inc.
...period of seven years or more. See Smith, supra, 248 Ga. at 885(2)(b), 286 S.E.2d 739; Smith, supra, 248 Ga. at 158(2), 282 S.E.2d 76; Jergens v. Stanley;24 Chatham Motorcycle Club, supra, 214 Ga. at 774-775(1), 107 S.E.2d 806;. Furthermore, a finding of public acceptance is not precluded b......
-
Pulte Home Co. v. Juanita M. Aycock Living Trust
...(1) an intention by the owner to dedicate the land to public use, and (2) an acceptance thereof by the public." Jergens v. Stanley , 247 Ga. 543, 544, 277 S.E.2d 651 (1981). Although the trust does not dispute that Cobb County accepted a dedication of Daffodil Drive for public use, for cont......
-
Cobb County v. Crew
...to public use are (1) an intention of the owner to dedicate and (2) acceptance of the dedication by the public. Jergens v. Stanley, 247 Ga. 543, 277 S.E.2d 651 (1981)." Moreland v. Henson, 256 Ga. 685, 687, 353 S.E.2d 181 (1987). An owner may dedicate her land to public use by an express or......