Jewell v. State, 53739
Decision Date | 02 May 1977 |
Docket Number | No. 2,No. 53739,53739,2 |
Citation | 142 Ga.App. 169,235 S.E.2d 637 |
Parties | Jim JEWELL v. The STATE |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Guy B. Scott, Jr., Athens, for appellant.
Ken Stula, Sol., Athens, for appellee.
The defendant appeals his conviction for possession of nontax-paid liquor. Held:
1. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict.
2. The trial judge charged: "Now I charge you Ladies and Gentlemen that in this State where a person is married, the husband is known as the head of the household and all contraband found on the premises absent an explanation as to ownership being in some other party, would be the responsibility and under the control and ownership of the head of the household, he being the husband." This is contended to be erroneous.
Hendrix v. State, 24 Ga.App. 56, 57, 100 S.E. 55; Isom v. State, 32 Ga.App. 75, 122 S.E. 722. "To raise the presumption stated above, it is essential that it be proved that the husband and wife reside together on the premises where the whisky is found." Barron v. State, 46 Ga.App. 829(2), 169 S.E. 323. Accord, Cole v. State, 109 Ga.App. 576, 578, 136 S.E.2d 483. The charge as given failed to include the correct maxim and was error.
Judgment reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Burdett v. State
...premises where the contraband was found. McTier v. State, 153 Ga.App. 551, 553(3), 265 S.E.2d 876 (1980). Compare Jewell v. State, 142 Ga.App. 169, 235 S.E.2d 637 (1977). 3. Appellant enumerates as error the giving of the following charge: "[W]here one owns or is the lessee of the house or ......