JOA Corp. v. Lamerica Realty Co. of Miami, 82-2427

Decision Date09 August 1983
Docket NumberNo. 82-2427,82-2427
Citation435 So.2d 972
PartiesJOA CORPORATION, Appellant, v. LAMERICA REALTY COMPANY OF MIAMI, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Frank R.S. Fabre, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Ruben L. deLeon, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant herein, defendant in the trial court, seeks review of an adverse final judgment entered by the trial court, sitting as trier of the fact, in a case wherein the appellee sought damages for breach of a real estate brokerage contract.

The appellant has raised 5 points on appeal all of which go either to the question of whether the appellee was hired to complete the sale and whether it produced a buyer ready and willing to purchase the property. The trial court's ruling was predicated in part on the testimony of the parties which was neither reported or filed in this court. 1 Thus this court is unable to review the correctness of the order appealed and therefore the final judgment here under review is affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Lang v. Lang, 416 So.2d 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Kauffmann v. Baker, 392 So.2d 13 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

1 Pursuant to Rule 9.200(f)(2), Fla.R.App.P., we entered an order directing the appellant to complete the record on appeal in accordance with Rule 9.200(a), (b), (f), Fla.R.App.P. Notwithstanding this order the appellant failed to supplement the record with any testimony or statement pursuant to applicable appellate rules.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Holland Intern., Inc. v. Pollack
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 4, 1985
    ...of the remaining orders. See e.g., Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Joa Corp. v. Lamerica Realty Co. of Miami, 435 So.2d 972 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Besade v. Besade, 430 So.2d 927 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Okun v. Stuart House Condominium Association, Inc., 362 So......
  • Chamberlain v. Chamberlain
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 21, 1991
    ...... appellant." If the record is insufficient to demonstrate reversible error, the case must be affirmed. JOA Corp. v. Lamerica Realty Co. of Miami, 435 So.2d 972 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); see also, City of Hialeah v. Cascardo, 443 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Because the hearing which resulted......
  • Marcus v. Sullivan, 96-1492
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 26, 1997
    ...part of the record on appeal, "this court is unable to review the correctness of the order appealed." JOA Corp. v. Lamerica Realty Co. of Miami, 435 So.2d 972, 973 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); see also Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). For that reason, and be......
  • Meyer v. Robert E. Schack, P.A., 4
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 22, 1993
    ...JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); JOA Corp. v. Lamerica Realty Co. of Miami, 435 So.2d 972 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT