John Hale, Plaintiff In Error v. William Gaines and Maria Gaines His Wife, Albert Belding, Henry Belding, and George Belding, Heirs and Legal Representatives of Ludovicus Belding, Deceased Defendants
Decision Date | 01 December 1859 |
Parties | JOHN C. HALE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM H. GAINES AND MARIA GAINES HIS WIFE, ALBERT BELDING, HENRY BELDING, AND GEORGE BELDING, HEIRS AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF LUDOVICUS BELDING, DECEASED, DEFENDANTS |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial10 cases
-
United States v. Seal
...priores contrarias abrogant—the rule that the more recent of two conflicting statutes shall prevail. Hale v. Gaines, 63 U.S. 144, 148–49, 22 How. 144, 16 L.Ed. 264 (1859); see also Watt v. Alaska, 451 U.S. 259, 285, 101 S.Ct. 1673, 68 L.Ed.2d 80 (1981) (Stewart, J. dissenting) (“If two inco......
-
Magwire v. Tyler
...22 How. 334, 341; Burgess v. Gray, 16 How. 48, 65; Willott v. Sandford, 19 How. 79, 82; Strother v. Lucas, 12 Pet. 415; Haile v. Gaines, 22 How. 144, 160; Chouteau v. Eckhart, 2 How. 345; Lafayette's Heirs v. Kenton, 18 How. 197; Doe v. Braden, 16 Id. 635, 657; Foster v. Neilson, 2 Pet. 253......
-
Hammond v. Coleman
...v. Tyler, 12 Mich. 342; Himry County v. Bradshaw, 20 Iowa, 362. B. A. HILL, for defendants in error: Survey and return.-- Hale v. Gaines, 22 How. 144; Easton v. Salisbury, 21 How. 426. Confirmation.-- West v. Cochran, 17 How. 413; Standford v. Taylor, 18 How.; Maguire v. Tyler, 8 Wall. 650,......
-
Block v. Morrison
...Bagnell v. Broderick, 13 Pet. 436; Stoddard v. Chambers, 2 How. 294; Barry v. Gamble, 3 How. 51; Lessieur v. Price, 12 How. 60; Hale v. Gaines, 22 How. 144; Rector Ashley, 6 Wall. 142; Gibson v. Chouteau, 13 Wall. 92; Mackay v. Easton, 19 Wall. 633; Hot Springs Cases, 2 Otto, 712. (6) The d......
Request a trial to view additional results