Johnson v. Alabama
| Decision Date | 03 October 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 87-7098,87-7098 |
| Parties | Anthony Keith JOHNSON v. ALABAMA |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
See 488 U.S. 976, 109 S.Ct. 518.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 227, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 2950, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.
I continue to adhere to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 231, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 2973, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976) (MARSHALL, J., dissenting). I also continue to believe that the death penalty's cruel and unusual nature is made all the more arbitrary and freakish when it is imposed by a judge in the face of a jury determination that the appropriate penalty is life imprisonment. See Spaziano v. Florida, 468 U.S. 447, 467, 104 S.Ct. 3154, 3166, 82 L.Ed.2d 340 (1984) (STEVENS, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). Therefore, I would grant the petition for writ of certiorari and vacate petitioner's death sentence for the reasons I expressed in Jones v. Alabama, 470 U.S. 1062, 1063, 105 S.Ct. 1779, 1780, 84 L.Ed.2d 838 (1985) (MARSHALL, J., dissenting).
In this case, after a full hearing, the jury determined that life imprisonment, not death, was the punishment which petitioner deserved. Nevertheless, following Alabama law which allows him wide discretion in death sentences, the trial judge overrode the jury's determination and sentenced petitioner to death. I continue to believe that "[i]t approaches the most literal sense of the word 'arbitrary' to put one to death in the face of a contrary jury determination where it is accepted that the jury had indeed responsibly carried out its task." Jones v. Alabama, supra, at 1065, 105 S.Ct., at 1781.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kuenzel v. State
...prejudicial." Johnson v. State, 521 So.2d 1006, 1013 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), affirmed, 521 So.2d 1018 (Ala.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 876, 109 S.Ct. 193, 102 L.Ed.2d 162 (1988). The trial judge entered three orders summarizing the evidence and his findings: 1) "Finding of fact by the court from t......
-
Fresno Unified Sch. Dist. v. K.U.
... ... amendment by failing to seek amendment reasonably promptly after it ‘knew or should have known’ that amendment was called for.” Johnson v. Hewlett–Packard Co., 809 F.Supp.2d 1114, 1120 (N.D.Cal.2011), aff'd, 546 Fed.Appx. 613, 2013 WL 4757161 (9th Cir.2013), quoting ... ...
-
Williams v. State
...per se, prejudicial." Johnson v. State, 521 So.2d 1006, 1031 (Ala.Cr..App.1986), affirmed, 521 So.2d 1018 (Ala.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 876, 109 S.Ct. 193 ... (1988).' Lawhorn, 581 So.2d at 1171, quoting Kuenzel, 577 So.2d at 527. In both Lawhorn and Kuenzel this court noted that it was ap......
-
Lawhorn v. Haley
... 323 F.Supp.2d 1158 ... James Charles LAWHORN, Petitioner, ... Michael W. HALEY, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Respondents ... No. CIV.A. CV01C0029E ... United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Eastern Division ... March ... The prosecutor's remarks made in paragraphs (c) and (d) constitute improper vouching and improper personal opinion. Johnson v. Wainwright, 778 F.2d 623, 630-31. (11th Cir.1985). Even though the remarks are improper, the respondents correctly point out that the burden is ... ...