Johnson v. BD. OF CONTROL OF EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Decision Date | 15 January 1999 |
Parties | Inge P. JOHNSON v. BOARD OF CONTROL OF the EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALABAMA. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
J. Mark White and William M. Bowen, Jr., of White, Dunn & Booker, Birmingham, for appellant.
William T. Stephens and William F. Kelley, Jr., Montgomery, for appellee. James C. Barton, Artur G. Davis, and Anna R. Minor of Johnston, Barton, Proctor & Powell, L.L.P., Birmingham, for amici curiae Alabama Ass'n of Circuit Judges and Alabama Ass'n of District Judges, in support of Judge Inge P. Johnson, on application for rehearing.
This case involves purely a question of law that has not heretofore been addressed by this Court: Does a circuit judge who meets the eligibility requirements for retirement as provided by Ala. Code 1975, § 12-18-6(b)(5), lose the right to those benefits upon his or her appointment as a United States district judge?
Inge Johnson, a circuit judge, who participated in the Judicial Retirement System for almost 20 years, has appealed from an order of the Board of Control of the Employees' Retirement System of Alabama denying her claim for retirement benefits.
The parties have stipulated to the following facts:
By constitutional provision, Alabama has historically denied the legislature the authority to provide for retirement benefits for state officers, including, by implication, judges. This restriction on the legislative power is currently found in Article IV, § 98, of the Alabama Constitution of 1901:
"The legislature shall not retire any officer on pay, or part pay, or make any grant to such retiring officer."
This constitutional prohibition against providing pensions for state officials led to legislation over the years creating supernumerary positions for certain state officials who met the statutory requirements for such positions. These statutes creating supernumerary positions were enacted to compensate certain public officials who had served the state for a number of years (as prescribed by statute) and who had reached a certain age (also prescribed by statute), provided that the official entering upon the supernumerary office performed certain duties prescribed by the legislature. See James v. Thompson, 392 So.2d 1178 (Ala.1981). Because Article IV, § 98, of the constitution prohibited laws granting retirement benefits to such state officials, the validity of these statutes depended upon the fact that these supernumerary officials performed certain duties and responsibilities [related to] the supernumerary office created. Although these statutes may have been drafted deliberately to evade the constitutional prohibition against legislation granting retirement pay to state officials, it is clear that the compensation provided was in exchange for services performed by the supernumerary officials, as opposed to compensation for past service to the state.
For example, by Act No. 357, Ala. Acts 1979 (§ 36-22-60 et seq., Ala.Code 1975), the legislature created the office of supernumerary sheriff. This act permitted a sheriff who had served for at least 16 years in law enforcement, 12 as sheriff, and who had reached 55 years of age to elect to become a supernumerary sheriff, subject to call to active duty by the Governor.
Sheriffs were not the only officials who were permitted to assume office as super-numeraries.1 Act No. 288, Ala. Acts 1945, adopted July 7,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Honulik v. Town of Greenwich
...retirement would be illegal since they have would have no authority to exercise judicial power); Johnson v. Board of Control of the Employees' Retirement System, 740 So.2d 999, 1012 (Ala.1999) (holding that retired state judge who is not vested with authority to exercise state power does no......
-
Slagle v. Ross
...appointee from engaging in the private practice of law. We reject Slagle's contention. In Johnson v. Board of Control of the Employees' Retirement System of Alabama, 740 So.2d 999, 1011–12 (Ala.1999), this Court observed: “Under the provisions of the Judicial Article, constraints are placed......
-
Wilbanks Health Care v. Medicaid Agency
...recognized expertise in specific specialized areas entrusted to them by the [L]egislature.'" Johnson v. Board of Control of the Employees' Retirement Sys. of Alabama, 740 So.2d 999, 1023 (Ala.1999)(quoting McRae v. General Retirement Sys. for Employees of Jefferson County, 536 So.2d 71, 72 ......
-
Cleburne County Com'n v. Norton
...of 1901, which states that no law may be enacted impairing the obligations of a contract. In Johnson v. Board of Control of Employees' Retirement System of Alabama, 740 So.2d 999 (Ala.1999), Justice Shores detailed the history of supernumerary officials in "By constitutional provision, Alab......