Johnson v. Chater

Decision Date19 June 1997
Docket NumberNo. 96 C 3537.,96 C 3537.
Citation969 F.Supp. 493
PartiesDavid JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois

Marcie E. Goldbloom, Frederick J. Daley, Frederick J. Daley, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.

Carole Judith Ryczek, United States Attorney's Office, Chicago, IL, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CASTILLO, District Judge.

On February 13, 1995, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) denied David Johnson's applications for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423(d), 1381a, 1382c(a)(3)(A). He now appeals that decision in federal district court as permitted by 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), which grants federal courts the power to review the Social Security Commissioner's final decisions1 via a federal civil action. The accepted procedural vehicle for obtaining judicial review of a social security benefits determination is a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which both Johnson and the Commissioner have submitted here.2 For the reasons that follow, we affirm the ALJ's decision.

RELEVANT FACTS

We begin with a brief overview of the facts, then move on to a more detailed review of the record. Johnson is a 35-year-old man who currently lives with his father and sister. He has at least a tenth grade education3 and is capable of reading, writing, and basic math. Johnson's memory and intellect are within normal limits, although he testified that his grade school recommended placement in special education — an option his father rejected. From 1979 (the year Johnson would have graduated from high school) until he left his most recent position in 1993, Johnson held jobs as a retail store janitor, hotel housekeeper, gas station attendant, hotel clerk, and food service worker.

Johnson suffers a back malady stemming from a 1990 injury he sustained while working as a food service employee at United Airlines. After undergoing back surgery, Johnson returned to work and was placed on a "light duty" assignment to accommodate his reduced physical capacity. Although the surgery initially alleviated his back pain, the pain soon returned and intensified, accompanied by leg pain, to the point that Johnson claims he could no longer work in even a sedentary capacity. Johnson stopped working at United Airlines in early to mid-1993.4 During the summer and fall of that year, Johnson received treatment for his back and leg pain, which included a short stint at a pain treatment center.

In addition to his back ailments, Johnson suffers from an eye condition that limits his vision, and has been diagnosed with depression and a substance abuse disorder. Johnson's psychological problems did not surface until 1994, when he was hospitalized ten days in August and two days in September for alcohol and cocaine intoxication. He was diagnosed with polydrug dependence, manifested in acute toxic psychosis, and atypical affective disorder. Johnson's symptoms, which included depression, anxiety, and paranoia, diminished significantly with detoxification, and the acute toxic psychosis was resolved before Johnson's latest discharge. When asked at the administrative hearing whether he had mental impairments, Johnson mentioned that he possesses some "character defects," but did not report depression or substance abuse. In response to further questioning, he told the ALJ that he was no longer using drugs or alcohol, and that he had taken antidepressant medication for only a month and stopped. Other than the brief August and September 1994 hospitalizations, Johnson has never been under the care of a psychiatrist and has not since returned for inpatient psychiatric treatment.

Johnson filed for SSI benefits on November 22, 1993 (with a protected filing date of September 15) and for DIB in February 1994, alleging that he had become disabled as a result of his back injury and the residual pain from surgery. His applications were denied on May 31, 1994 and June 21, 1994. Johnson filed a timely request for reconsideration, which was denied on October 6, 1994. Represented by counsel, he appeared before ALJ Bonny Barezky on January 23, 1995. She denied Johnson's applications for benefits in a ruling issued February 13, 1995, finding that Johnson was capable of performing his previous light duty job at United Airlines. Johnson next petitioned the Appeals Council to review the ALJ's decision; his request was denied on February 26, 1996. After the Council extended Johnson's time to appeal, he filed a complaint in this Court on June 12, 1996, requesting review of the Commissioner's final decision. Johnson does not contest the ALJ's decision as it relates to the functional restrictions of his physical impairments. Rather, he claims that the ALJ's decision denying benefits lacks substantial evidentiary support insofar as it ignores the limitations imposed by his mental impairments. We now consider the record to determine whether Johnson's assessment is correct.

I. Johnson's Testimony

At the hearing, Johnson was assisted by counsel, who began the proceedings by telling the ALJ, "this is basically a pain case." (R.50). When asked what impairments Johnson was claiming, the attorney answered that Johnson's back problem and attendant pain were the basis for alleging a disability. He said nothing about mental impairments. Consistent with this focus, the evidence addressing Johnson's mental impairments constitutes a very small portion of the record. Given that Johnson's challenge is to the ALJ's consideration of mental impairments only, our discussion of Johnson's physical impairments is limited.

Johnson was 33 years old at the time of the hearing. He lives in Chicago with his father and sister, who assist him physically and take care of all the housework and shopping. Johnson has struggled academically: he told the ALJ that his last full year in school was tenth grade and that he was held back in fourth grade. Johnson was never enrolled in special education classes, but attributes this to his father's refusal to follow the school's recommendations. Still, Johnson considers himself to be "pretty good" at reading and writing, adding, subtracting and multiplying. He believes he can read a newspaper (or could before his vision began to deteriorate) and is capable of finding the programs he wants to watch in T.V. Guide.

Johnson held various jobs between 1979 and 1986. In 1987, he began working for United Airlines as a food service employee. Following his surgery in 1990, Johnson returned to work in a light duty position, where he was responsible for such tasks as rolling silverware, filling salt and pepper shakers, and making coffee bags. He was required to lift no more than ten pounds. The job was full-time, and permitted Johnson to alternate between sitting and standing at will. At times, he was allowed to go to the company medical facility and lie down. Johnson stopped working in February 1993 because United "didn't have any work for me to do at the time." But what ultimately prevented him from returning is debilitating back and leg pain. Johnson testified that he still has a strong desire to work; to this end, he tried on a number of occasions to return, without success. He did not attribute his failure to return to work to feelings of depression or problems with substance abuse.

As his back problems became more severe in mid-1993, Johnson began abusing crack cocaine and alcohol. His substance abuse culminated in a short period of hospitalization during the fall of 1994. He was treated by Dr. Gomez, a psychiatrist. Gomez diagnosed Johnson with polydrug dependence and atypical affective disorder, and prescribed a trial of antidepressant medication. Johnson took antidepressants for a month in September 1994. He couldn't remember the name of the medication, but thought it was similar to Prozac. Asked whether taking the pills alleviated his depression, Johnson said he couldn't tell, but Dr. Gomez seemed to think it was helping. Johnson did not indicate that he was still suffering from depression, and antidepressants did not surface in the litany of Johnson's current medications. Relating the status of his problem with substance abuse, Johnson told the ALJ that he was not currently using either cocaine or alcohol, and had been clean for about three months. He has never been arrested or lost a job because of alcohol or other drug abuse.

When asked whether he believes that he presently suffers from any mental impairments, Johnson responded only that he has some "character defects":

A: Let me see if I can explain them to you. Sometimes I feel that people are doing things intentionally to me, you know, and in reality nobody is doing anything to me. You know, I feel that sometimes people are out to get me sometimes [sic], you know, this is even prior to my accident, but I've been dealing with it pretty good. I guess you could call it paranoia or whatever, but sometimes it feels as though people are just trying to misuse me.

Q: And did you have this before your drug abuse?

A: Yes, I did. Do you know, and then, you know, sometimes like if I'm with a coworker or something like that, and I'm not doing my job right, or I'm not — you know, it's not — this is the way it's supposed to be done, you know, I'll get pissed off at my coworker because it's not helping him and it's not helping me and it's not helping her and it's not helping me, you know, and I don't feel good being the dumb one, or whatever, or being the one that they couldn't complete or do the task, you know. And then I'll get angry.

(R.77). Johnson also included in his discussion of character defects the fact that he sometimes has difficulty getting along with coworkers, but explained that "I'm the same...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Aytch v. Astrue, 4:09-CV-15-FL.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of North Carolina
    • February 18, 2010
    ...right hip pain; (2) alcoholism; (3) diabetes and the resulting leg and feet pain; and (4) arthritis. (R. 317). See Johnson v. Chater, 969 F.Supp. 493, 509 (N.D.Ill.1997) ("When an applicant for social security benefits is represented by counsel, the ALJ is entitled to assume that the applic......
  • Graham v. Apfel, 3:98CV887 AWT.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut
    • September 1, 1999
    ...of demonstrating that he suffers from an impairment lasting or expected to last for at least twelve months. See Johnson v. Chater, 969 F.Supp. 493, 507 n. 8 (N.D.Ill.1997) (noting that finding of disability must be premised on impairment lasting at least twelve months and that no objective ......
  • Lingenfelter v. Astrue, Case No.: 5:13-CV-00101-EJD
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • March 11, 2014
    ...thereof. Id. at 133-134, 118. Thus, the ALJ was not effectively notified of Plaintiff's asthmatic impairment. See Johnson v. Chater, 969 F.Supp. 493, 509 (N.D. Ill. 1997) ("[W]hen an applicant for social security benefits is represented by counsel, the [ALJ] is entitled to assume that the a......
  • Asberry-Whitt v. Barnhart, IP 02-0377-C-T/L (S.D. Ind. 7/5/2003), IP 02-0377-C-T/L.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Indiana
    • July 5, 2003
    ...by inquiring into the present status of the impairment and its possible effects on the claimant's ability to work." Johnson v. Chater, 969 F. Supp. 493, 506 (N.D.Ill. 1997) (citing Stambaugh v. Sullivan, 929 F.2d 292, 295 (7th Cir. 1991)). See also 20 C.F.R. § 404.1517 ("If your medical sou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
  • Issue Topics
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Social Security Disability Collection - James' Best Materials. Volume 2
    • May 5, 2015
    ...803 F.2d 917, 926 (7th Cir. 1986), that an ALJ may not determine RFC solely on the basis of “bare medical findings.” Johnson v. Chater , 969 F. Supp. 493, 509 (N.D. Ill. 1997). The court reasoned that the ALJ did not limit her consideration to bare medical findings, but rather weighed the e......
  • Assessment of disability issues
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Social Security Issues Annotated. Vol. I - 2014 Contents
    • August 2, 2014
    ...sources; (3) ask the claimant for more information; or (4) ask the claimant to submit to a consultative examination. Johnson v. Chater , 969 F. Supp. 493, 506 (N.D. Ill. 1997), citing 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1512(e), 404.1527(c)(3); Luna v. Shalala , 22 F.3d 687, 693 (7 th Cir. 1994). (4) After ho......
  • Specific impairments issues
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Social Security Issues Annotated. Vol. II - 2014 Contents
    • August 3, 2014
    ...if substance abuse could be disabling in theory, the claimant’s actual involvement with drugs and alcohol was not. Johnson v. Chater , 969 F. Supp. 493, 507 n.7 (N.D. Ill. 1997). g. Eighth Circuit (1) The Eighth Circuit stated that the Social Security Act was amended to exclude disability b......
  • Issue topics
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Bohr's Social Security Issues Annotated - Volume II
    • May 4, 2015
    ...803 F.2d 917, 926 (7th Cir. 1986), that an ALJ may not determine RFC solely on the basis of “bare medical findings.” Johnson v. Chater , 969 F. Supp. 493, 509 (N.D. Ill. 1997). The court reasoned that the ALJ did not limit her consideration to bare medical findings, but rather weighed the e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT