Johnson v. Com.
| Decision Date | 18 February 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 1303-85,1303-85 |
| Citation | 339 S.E.2d 919,1 Va. App. 510 |
| Parties | Leroy JOHNSON a/k/a Gary Jones v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record |
| Court | Virginia Court of Appeals |
Present: DUFF, BENTON and COLE, JJ.
The appellant has failed to comply with Rule 5A:6(a) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals, which requires counsel to file his notice of appeal within 30 days after entry of final judgment with the clerk of the trial court, and at the same time to mail or deliver a copy of such notice to all opposing counsel and the clerk of the Court of Appeals.He has failed to comply since he did not mail or deliver a copy of the notice of appeal to the clerk of the Court of Appeals.The sole issue is whether that part of the rule requiring a copy of the notice of appeal to be mailed or delivered to the clerk of the Court of Appeals is jurisdictional.We hold that it is not.
On August 20, 1985, the appellant, Leroy Johnson, a/k/a Gary Jones, was convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit larceny and grand larceny, and was sentenced to serve 15 years in the penitentiary.He appealed these convictions and his notice of appeal was filed with the clerk of the trial court on September 6, 1985.Counsel for the appellant mailed a copy of the notice of appeal to the Commonwealth's Attorney, but failed to mail a copy of the notice of appeal to the clerk's office of this Court.On motion of the appellant, we are asked to grant an extension of time to permit compliance with the rule.The Commonwealth has not responded to the motion.
Rule 5A:6(a) provides:
(a) Timeliness.--No appeal shall be allowed unless, within 30 days after entry of final judgment or other appealable order or decree, counsel files with the clerk of the trial court a notice of appeal, and at the same time mails or delivers a copy of such notice to all opposing counsel and the clerk of the Court of Appeals.
Rule 5A:3 deals with extensions of time and provides:
(a) The times prescribed for filing the notice of appeal (Rules 5A:6and5A:11), a petition for appeal(Rule 5A:12), a petition for rehearing(Rule 5A:33), and a request for rehearing en banc (Rule 5A:34) are mandatory....
(b) Except as provided in subsection (a) of this Rule, the times prescribed in these Rules for filing papers may be extended by a judge of the court in which the papers are to be filed on motion for good cause shown and to attain the ends of justice.
We have held that the failure to file a notice of appeal with the clerk of the trial court within 30 days after entry of final judgment as required in Rule 5A:6(a) is jurisdictional and that we have no authority to extend the time under Rule 5A:3.Williams v. Landon, 1 Va.App. 206, 336 S.E.2d 907(1985);cf.Vaughn v. Vaughn, 215 Va. 328, 329, 210 S.E.2d 140, 142(1974).
Since Rule 5A:6(a) differs from Supreme Court Rule 5:9(a) in that the latter contains no provision for mailing or delivering a copy of the notice of appeal to the clerk's office, no precedents of the Supreme Court provide us guidance.
Both our Rule 5A:6(a) and the Supreme Court Rule 5:9(a) require that a copy of the notice of appeal be mailed or delivered to all opposing counsel.Our rule connects the mailing and delivering a copy of the notice of appeal to opposing counsel with mailing and delivering a copy to our clerk's office.We find no reported case where the Supreme Court has held that failure to mail or deliver a copy of the notice of appeal to opposing counsel is jurisdictional.
The requirement to mail or deliver a copy of the notice of appeal to the clerk of the Court of Appeals was initially adopted in our Rules at the inception of the Court.It was thought that the clerk of the Court of Appeals would find a copy of the notice of appeal useful in his office for informational purposes.The rule was written to accommodate this need.This informs him that an appeal is in process, permits him to establish a file, aids him in handling early motions that might be filed by the parties, and enables him to answer inquiries about the case from counsel and the public.Thus, the origin of this rule is of an administrative nature.
We conclude that the act of mailing and...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
McCray v. Com.
...notice of appeal with the clerk of the trial court within 30 days after entry of final judgment as required in Rule 5A:6(a) is jurisdictional[,] and ... we have no authority to extend the time under Rule 5A:3."
Johnson v. Commonwealth, 1 Va.App. 510, 512, 339 S.E.2d 919, 920 (1986); see also Rule 5A:3 ("The time[] prescribed for filing the notice of appeal ... [is] mandatory."). Because appellant's notice of appeal failed to include any reference whatsoever to the probation revocation... -
Commonwealth v. Hackett, Record No. 2594-07-2 (Va. App. 3/11/2008)
...by members of the bar'" and that "[a] petitioner who fails to include one or more issues in his petition for appeal and subsequently asks the Court for leave to enlarge the petition acts at his peril because the Court is not compelled to grant such leave" (quoting
Johnson, 1 Va. App. at 513, 339 S.E.2d at 921)); United States v. Hatfield, 365 F.3d 332, 337-38 (4th Cir. 2004) (under federal statute containing similar certification language, holding that in the case of the19.2-398(A)] unless within seven days after entry of the order . . ., the Commonwealth files a notice of appeal with the clerk of the trial court." Code § 19.2-400 (emphasis added); cf. Johnson v. Commonwealth, 1 Va. App. 510, 511-12, 339 S.E.2d 919, 920 (1986)(holding language in Rule 5A:6 providing, inter alia, that "No appeal shall be allowed unless, within 30 days after entry of final judgment . . . counsel files with the clerk of the trial court a notice of appeal," sets out... -
MG v. Albemarle County
...file a notice of appeal with the clerk of the trial court within 30 days after entry of final judgment as required in Rule 5A:6(a) is jurisdictional and that we have no authority to extend the time...."
Johnson v. Commonwealth, 1 Va.App. 510, 512, 339 S.E.2d 919, 920 (1986). Further, in a suit involving a termination of parental rights, a guardian ad litem for the child or children is an indispensable party to the appeal and, thus, qualifies as an "opposing counsel" under Rule 5A:6(a),do not minimize the necessity of adherence to the mandate of the Rule[s] by members of the bar. We consider the requirement[s] in the Rulers] to be significant and one[s] that should not be ignored." Johnson, 1 Va.App. at 513, 339 S.E.2d at 921. However, [b]ecause appellant did in fact file a [timely] notice of appeal, and because the purpose of Rule 5A:6 was met, notice being given to appellees of continuing litigation, we hold that, under the facts of this case, dismissal for failure... -
Carrithers v. Harrah
...of appeal, filed on August 30, 2011, did not give this Court jurisdiction to review any of the arguments he now seeks to make.2 Therefore, we are obliged to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Johnson v. Commonwealth, 1 Va.App. 510 , 512, 339 S.E.2d 919 , 920 (1986)(noting that “the failure to file a notice of appeal with the clerk of the trial court within 30 days after entry of final judgment as required in Rule 5A:6(a) is III. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we...
-
2.4 Mechanics of the Appeal
...attorney authorized to practice in Virginia has to sign and file notice of appeal within 30 days, and a late-filed supplement to the original notice was held not sufficient.).[166] See, e.g., Johnson v. Commonwealth,
1 Va. App. 510, 339 S.E.2d 919 (1986).[167] Va. Code §§ 8.01-676.1(C), 19.2-319; see also supra ¶ 2.306 (security for appeal).[168] Va. Code §§ 8.01-631(B), 8.01-676.1(D).[169] In re Commonwealth, Dep't of Corr., 222 Va. 454, 463, 281 S.E.2d 857,... -
2.9 Mechanics of the Appeal
...attorney authorized to practice in Virginia has to sign and file notice of appeal within 30 days, and a late-filed supplement to the original notice was held not sufficient.).[288] See, e.g., Johnson v. Commonwealth,
1 Va. App. 510, 339 S.E.2d 919 (1986).[289] Va. Code §§ 8.01-676.1(C), 19.2-319; see also supra ¶ 2.806 (security for appeal).[290] Va. Code §§ 8.01-631(B), 8.01-676.1(D).[291] In re Commonwealth, Dep't of Corr., 222 Va. 454, 463, 281 S.E.2d 857,... -
13.3 Appeal from Circuit Court to Court of Appeals
...expiration of the 21 days after the order was entered, or the court may lose the power to give the later relief. See Hackett v. Commonwealth, 293 Va. 392, 799 S.E.2d 501 (2017).[92] Va. R. 5A:6(a); see Johnson v. Commonwealth,
1 Va. App. 510, 339 S.E.2d 919 (1986). Any document, including the notice of appeal, required to be filed with the clerk of the Court of Appeals will be deemed timely filed if it is mailed to the clerk postage prepaid by registered or...