Johnson v. Cook, 48433
Decision Date | 10 January 1974 |
Docket Number | No. 1,No. 48433,48433,1 |
Citation | 203 S.E.2d 882,130 Ga.App. 575 |
Parties | Felix T. JOHNSON v. Curtis COOK |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Wyman C. Lowe, Atlanta, for appellant.
Curtis M. Cook, Atlanta, for appellee.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
This appeal was taken from the overruling of the defendant's motion to set aside a judgment which was rendered against him. The plaintiff brought suit in the Civil Court of Fulton County seeking to recover the sum of $790.50 against the defendant. Subsequently, the case came on for trial before a judge without a jury who entered a judgment which recited: 'After hearing evidence it is considered, ordered and adjudged that the plaintiff recover from the defendant the principal sum of $790.50.' Neither the defendant nor his counsel appeared at the call of the case or during the trial thereof.
The defendant in the motion contended that he had a valid defense to the action and offered excuses as to why his counsel overlooked the case on the calendar of which was published in the Fulton County Daily Report. It is also urged that the defendant filed an answer to the complaint but such answer was at some point in time lost or misplaced. Held:
1. Our new provisions with regard to default judgments contained in Section 55 of the Civil Practice Act (Code Ann. § 81A-155; Ga.L.1966, pp. 609, 659; 1967, pp. 226, 238) are substantial restatements of former Code Ann. § 110-401 et seq. (Ga.L.1946, pp. 761, 777; 1952, p. 195; 1953, Nov.Sess. pp. 440, 451; 1962, pp. 687, 688). See Georgia Farm Bureau, etc., Ins. Co. v. Williamson, 124 Ga.App. 549, 550, 184 S.E.2d 665. As pointed out in the former Code Sections, there is a distinct difference between the rights of the defendant after default and after a final judgment has been rendered. After a final judgment, Code Ann. § 110-404 (Ga.L.1946, pp. 761, 778) (allowing a default to be opened prior to final judgment for providential cause or excusable neglect or in 'a proper case') no longer applied. Burger v. Dobbs, 87 Ga.App. 88, 90, 73 S.E.2d 75; Parker v. Branan, 108 Ga.App. 229, 132 S.E.2d 556; Mathews & Co. v. Bishop, 106 Ga. 564(1), 32 S.E. 631.
The applicability of the distinction above mentioned has been set forth in decisions considering Section 55(b) of the Civil Practice Act (Code Ann. § 81A-155(b); Ga.L.1966, pp. 609, 659; 1967, pp. 226, 238). Golden Star Inc. v. Broyles Ins. Agency, Inc., 118 Ga.App. 95, 162 S.E.2d 756; Southeast Ceramics, Inc. v. Ervin Co., 127 Ga.App. 346, 347, 193 S.E.2d 262.
The instant motion was brought after final judgment. Hence, the question of excusable neglect is not before us, and it is not necessary to rule upon this point.
2. Any question with regard to the 'missing answer' is not relevant here since the defendant and his counsel failed to appear at the call for trial. In Georgia Farm Bureau, etc., Ins. Co. v. Williamson, 124 Ga.App. 549(3), 184 S.E.2d 665, supra, it was held: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
C & S Nat. Bank v. Burden, 55165
...662; 1967, pp. 226, 239, 240; 1974, p. 1138) provides the exclusive methods by which civil judgments may be attacked. Johnson v. Cook, 130 Ga.App. 575(3), 203 S.E.2d 882; Henry v. Polar Rock Dev. Corp., 143 Ga.App. 189(1), 237 S.E.2d 667. It provides, generally, for a collateral attack in a......
-
Stinson v. Georgia Dept. of Human Resources Credit Union
...vesting of rights. [Cits.]" Clements v. United Equity Corp., 125 Ga.App. 711, 712, 188 S.E.2d 923 (1972). Accord, Johnson v. Cook, 130 Ga.App. 575(1), 203 S.E.2d 882 (1974). Moreover, the trial court's refusal to grant appellant's motion to set aside the judgment or in the alternative for n......
-
Henry v. Polar Rock Development Corp.
...Ann. § 81A-160 specifies the manner in which a judgment may be attacked. The means prescribed therein are exclusive. Johnson v. Cook, 130 Ga.App. 575, 203 S.E.2d 882. Defendant's motion, styled 'Motion to Vacate,' must be treated as a motion to set aside if it is to have any validity at all......
-
Burrell v. Wood, 30634
...1968 judgment by some method other than those allowed; both actions were properly ruled to be without merit. See Johnson v. Cook, 130 Ga.App. 575, 577, 203 S.E.2d 882 (1974); Payne v. Shelnutt, 126 Ga.App. 598, 599, 191 S.E.2d 487 (1972). The trial court's order in the habeas corpus action ......