Johnson v. Jackson County
Decision Date | 09 December 1913 |
Citation | 68 Or. 432,136 P. 874 |
Parties | JOHNSON v. JACKSON COUNTY et al. [d] |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Department 2.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; F.M. Calkins, Judge.
Writ of review on petition of O.H. Johnson against Jackson County and others to review proceedings of the County Court. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
This is an appeal by defendants from the judgment on a writ of review issued on petition of plaintiff to review the proceedings of the county court of Jackson county, Or., in January, 1913 levying a three-mill tax on all the taxable property of the county, including the property of plaintiff situated within the limits of the city of Ashland in said county, for a road fund, pursuant to section 6320, L.O.L. The circuit court adjudged that plaintiff's property is exempt from this tax by virtue of section 1, art. 17, of the Charter of Ashland (Sp.L.1898, p. 100), which section reads thus
Porter J. Neff and E.E. Kelly, both of Medford (Neff & Mealey, of Medford, on the brief), for appellants.
W.J Moore, of Ashland, and A.E. Reames, of Medford, for respondent.
BEAN J. (after stating the facts as above).
It is contended by counsel for defendants that the foregoing section of the Ashland charter must be construed as exempting property within the city of Ashland from the payment only of one-half of the tax levied pursuant to section 6320, L.O.L., apportionable to the road districts of the county, and not from the one-half of the tax which is placed in a county fund for general road purposes, to be expended by the county court on the roads and bridges in any part of the county. It is their contention that section 6320, L.O.L., provides for a composite tax one-half thereof constituting a local district road tax, and the remaining one-half a general county tax equivalent to that formerly levied as a part of the general county fund for highway purposes. A glance at the section of the charter reveals that the area within the limits of the city of Ashland is excepted out of the jurisdiction of the county court of Jackson county for road purposes, and further that the inhabitants of that city are exempt from the payment of road taxes, and the property within the city is exempt from assessment for road work outside the city boundaries. Similar provisions in municipal charters have been upheld by this court in the following cases: East Portland v. Multnomah County, 6 Or. 62; Multnomah County v. Sliker, 10 Or. 65; Oregon City v. Moore, 30 Or. 215, 46 P. 1017, 47 P. 851; Eugene v. Lane County, 50 Or. 468, 93 P. 255; City of Nyssa v. Malheur County, 54 Or. 286, 103 P. 61; Tillamook City v. Tillamook County, 56 Or. 112, 107 P. 482. In the latter case Mr. Chief Justice McBride, speaking for the court, said: The Legislature,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jarvill v. City of Eugene
...uniformity of taxation, nevertheless permitted some territorially defined differentials in taxation. See, e. g., Johnson v. Jackson County, 68 Or. 432, 136 P. 874 (1914); City of East Portland v. County of Multnomah, 6 Or. 62 (1876). Other state courts also permitted some exception to the r......
-
State ex rel. Public Welfare Commission v. Malheur County Court
... ... equal and uniform throughout the taxing district, there is no ... violation of the constitutional mandate. Johnson v ... Jackson County, 68 Or. 432, 136 P. 874. In the case of ... Cook v. Port of Portland, 20 Or. 580, 27 P. 263, ... 266, 13 ... ...
-
State ex rel. Harth v. Phipps
...299 P. 1009 136 Or. 454 STATE EX REL. HARTH ET AL. v. PHIPPS, COUNTY JUDGE, ET AL. Supreme Court of OregonJune 2, 1931 ... In ... Bank ... has appealed to this court ... [136 ... Or. 455] J. J. Johnson, of Portland (Albert H. Tanner, of ... Portland, on the brief), for appellants ... 62; Tillamook City v. Tillamook County, 56 Or ... 112, 107 P. 482; Johnson v. Jackson County, 68 Or ... 432, 136 P. 874, 875. In the case last cited it was contended ... by ... ...
-
State ex rel. State Public Welfare Commission v. Malheur County Court
...that if a tax is equal and uniform throughout the taxing district, there is no violation of the constitutional mandate. Johnson v. Jackson County, 68 Or. 432, 136 P. 874. In the case of Cook v. The Port of Portland, 20 Or. 580, 27 P. 263, 13 L.R.A. 533, the court "* * * As was said by Mr. J......