Johnson v. Johnson, 23574
| Decision Date | 08 September 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. 23574,23574 |
| Parties | John Jacob JOHNSON v. Virginia Davis JOHNSON. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Cheeley & Merritt, Reid Merritt, Buford, G. Hughel Harrison, Lawrenceville, for plaintiff in error.
No appearence for defendant in error.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
1. The Constitution of Georgia of 1945, Art. VI, Sec. XIV, Par. I (Code Ann. § 2-4901) provides that 'divorce cases shall be brought in the county where the defendant resides, if a resident of this state; if the defendant be not a resident of this state, then in the county in which the plaintiff resides * * *' In Harmon v. Harmon, 209 Ga. 474(1), 74 S.E.2d 75, this court in construing and applying the above quoted provision of the Constitution held: '* * * (T)hese provisions of the Constitution are mandatory, exhaustive, jurisdictional, and without qualification; hence jurisdiction in a divorce action may not be conferred upon a court in which it is wanting either by the defendant's appearence and pleading or otherwise * * * (a) (T)he essential allegations in a petition for divorce, including jurisdiction, must be established by evidence, and the burden of proving such allegations rests upon the plaintiff * * * (b) (A)nd a divorce granted by a court having no jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties is a nullity.'
2. A petition brought by the wife against the husband in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, Georgia, praying for a divorce and custody of a minor child, which alleges that the defendant husband is a former resident of this State, but is now living in California, and that she, petitioner, 'has been a resident of said State (Georgia) for six months prior to filing her suit for divorce,' fails to allege facts required by Art. VI, Sec. XIV, Par. I of the Constitution of Georgia of 1945 (Code Ann. § 2-4901) to show that the Gwinnett Superior Court has jurisdiction, nor did the evidence show that the court had jurisdiction. It appears upon the face of the record that the Superior Court of Gwinnett County was without jurisdiction of this case. 'The judgment of a court having no jurisdiction of the person or subjectmatter, or void for any other cause, is a mere nullity, and may be so held in any court when it becomes material to the interest of the parties to consider it.' Code § 110-709. The judgment was void ab initio Jones v. Jones, 181 Ga. 747, 753, 184 S.E. 271; and being void the defendant would not be...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Benefield v. Harris
..."(d)ivorce cases shall be brought in the county where the defendant resides, if a resident of this State . . ." See Johnson v. Johnson, 222 Ga. 433(1), 150 S.E.2d 684. "Service of process in commencing a suit . . . can not be perfected by service by the sheriff on one described as the attor......
-
Mickas v. Mickas, 27105
...allegation of venue. Tate v. Tate, 220 Ga. 393, 139 S.E.2d 297. Such an allegation is distinguishable from that in Johnson v. Johnson, 222 Ga. 433, 150 S.E.2d 684 relied upon by the appellant where the ellegations were merely that the plaintiff had been a resident of Georgia for six No erro......
-
Fernandez v. Fernandez, s. 29034
...proceedings, that it could not take any further acton in the case by ordering the return of the children to Florida. See Johnson v. Johnson, 222 Ga. 433, 150 S.E.2d 684. Therefore, the father was correctly determined not to be in contempt of this provision of the court's earlier order as it......
-
Rice v. Rice
...requirements is essential to applications for divorce. Owens v. Owens, 189 Ga. 338(2), 5 S.E.2d 883 and citations; Johnson v. Johnson, 22 Ga. 433, 150 S.E.2d 684. However, the only allegation as to residence made in either the wife's petition for permanent alimony or the husband's answer an......