Johnson v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co.
| Decision Date | 23 February 1935 |
| Citation | 79 S.W.2d 39 |
| Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
| Parties | JOHNSON v. LIFE & CASUALTY INS. CO. |
Luther H. Graves, of Memphis, for plaintiff in error.
Waring, Walker & Cox, of Memphis, for defendant in error.
This is a suit upon an industrial insurance policy dismissed in the court below.
The sole question presented upon appeal is the validity of a contractual limitation contained in the policy as to the time in which suit thereupon may be brought. The policy provides: "No suit shall be brought against this company under this policy until sixty days after claim thereon has become due and proof thereon has been duly made nor after six months from that date."
It is insisted that the eight months' limitation thus provided is contrary to the public policy of the state, and should be disregarded by the court.
In Nashville Railway & Light Co. v. Lawson, 144 Tenn. 78, 229 S. W. 741, the court dealt at length with the matter of the test of the validity of a contract by public policy. It was said that the public policy of the state is to be deduced from the Constitution, statutes, and judicial decisions of the state, and from the common law. The rules announced in that case have not been challenged, although their application to the particular facts then before the court have been subject to some criticism.
Contractual limitations of actions on insurance policies were held valid and enforceable in Guthrie v. Connecticut Indemnity Association, 101 Tenn. 643, 49 S. W. 829, January 14, 1899.
After this decision, by subdivision 2 of section 2 of chapter 457 of the Acts of 1907, it was forbidden to issue in this state any policy of life insurance containing "a provision limiting the time within which any action at law or in equity may be commenced to less than five years after the cause of action shall accrue."
However, by section 6 of the same statute it was provided: "That this Act shall not apply to annuities, industrial policies, or to corporations or associations operating on the assessment * * * plan."
Under Guthrie v. Connecticut Industrial Association, supra, the policy of the state as declared by the court permitted contractual limitations generally upon the time in which suit might be brought on life insurance policies. By the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Home Beneficial Ass'n v. White
...life insurance and industrial life insurance was pointed out in a recent opinion of this Court in the case of Johnson v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co., 168 Tenn. 358, 79 S.W.2d 39, where it was held that the limitation of action, on the policy of industrial insurance there under consideration, t......
-
National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Grizzard
...at law or in equity may be commenced to less than five years after the cause of action shall accrue". See Johnson v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co., 168 Tenn. 358, 79 S.W.2d 39; Public Acts of 1937, Chapter We are unable to concur in the opinion of the learned trial judge that "the defendant......
-
Johnson v. Life & Cas. Ins. Co.
...79 S.W.2d 39 168 Tenn. 358 JOHNSON v. LIFE & CASUALTY INS. CO. Supreme Court of Tennessee.February 23, 1935 ... Error ... to Circuit Court, Shelby County; M. R. Patterson, Judge ... Action ... by Will Johnson against the Life & Casualty Insurance ... Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings ... ...
-
Horton v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.
...of insurance by our courts. Card v. Commercial Casualty Insurance Co., 20 Tenn. App. 132, 95 S.W.2d 1281; Johnson v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co., 168 Tenn. 358, 79 S.W.2d 39. If in doubt as to the soundness of the majority rule, this court would be disinclined to adopt the minority rule i......