Johnson v. Mercantile Trust Co. Nat. Ass'n
Decision Date | 13 May 1974 |
Docket Number | No. 57644,No. 1,57644,1 |
Citation | 510 S.W.2d 33 |
Parties | Belmont C. JOHNSON and Valera Johnson, Respondents, v. MERCANTILE TRUST COMPANY NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a corporation, Appellant |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Rosecan & Popkin, Alan E. Popkin, St. Louis, for respondents.
Thompson, Mitchell, Douglas, Neill, Guerri & Elbert, Edwin D. Akers, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.
HIGGINS, Commissioner.
Action by Belmont C. Johnson and Valera Johnson, his wife, for rescission of agreement to purchase 1,240 shares of capital stock of the Farmers and Merchants Bank of St. Clair, Missouri, owned by Mercantile Trust Company National Association; return of $128,967.02, representing principal and interest paid pursuant to the agreement; payment of $2,000 expended in defense of title to the stock; and cancellation of a note for $45,000 representing balance remaining on the purchase price. Counterclaim by Mercantile Trust Company National Association for recovery of $45,000 with interest on the note. The court found the issues for plaintiffs, rescinded the stock purchase agreement, ordered payment to plaintiffs of $160,662.02, and voided the $45,000 note, subject of defendant's counterclaim. (Appeal taken prior to January 1, 1972.)
Much of the evidence offered by both sides was documentary. Plaintiffs' version of the facts came primarily from Belmont C. Johnson; defendant's version came primarily from William A. Borders, an officer of defendant Bank, and Edward M. Edleson, a former employee of plaintiffs.
For purposes of this appeal, the facts may be stated as found by the trial court:
'On February 17, 1965, Security Trust Company loaned Arthur Lewis, Virginia Lewis and Plez Lewis Company the sum of $155,000.00 on six separate notes (hereinafter referred to as the Lewis Family notes). These notes were secured by a pledge of 1240 shares of the capital stock of the Farmers and Merchants Bank of St. Clair, Missouri (hereinafter referred to as the Lewis Family stock). This loan was made on behalf of Security Trust Company to the Lewises by Mr. William A. Borders, the then President of Security Trust Company.
'In July, 1965, Security Trust Company was merged into defendant Mercantile Trust Company National Association (hereinafter referred to as 'Mercantile') and the Lewis notes with the Lewis stock as security became the property of Mercantile.
business was also in the throes of bankruptcy. William A. Borders, after the merger, became an officer of the Mercantile Trust Company and a member of its Board of Directors and he was embarrassed by having made the Lewis loan and was eager to dispose of it.
'There were at that time four thousand shares of the capital stock of the Farmers and Merchants Bank of St. Clair issued and outstanding and something in excess of two thousand shares was, therefore, necessary for control of the bank.
office at Mercantile Trust Company. Borders repeated to plaintiff Belmont C. Johnson that defendant Mercantile was willing to sell him the Lewis shares but had to wait until February 17, 1966 because the Lewis loan would not be in default until that date and that the bank could not sell the stock until the loan was in default. Price was discussed and Borders told Johnson that the price was $125 per share. Johnson tried to buy the shares for less, offering $100 per share. Whenever price was discussed it was discussed in terms of so much per share. Borders was firm in insisting on $125 per share but during this first meeting Johnson tried to purchase the shares for less. The first meeting between the parties was concluded without any firm commitment by either party.
loan. Moreover, internal records of Mercantile also indicated that the notes were considered foreclosed as of February 21, 1966, and that the real collateral was the 1240 shares of stock.
'At no time during any of the meetings were plaintiffs or anyone representing plaintiffs shown the Lewis notes nor were plaintiffs nor anyone representing them told that they were being sold the Lewis notes and at no time during any of the meetings were plaintiffs or anyone representing them told of any endorsement placed or to be placed on the Lewis notes. Notwithstanding, the Lewis notes were endorsed by Borders to Belmont C. Johnson. There was, however, no acknowledgment on such endorsement either signed or initialed by plaintiff Belmont C. Johnson, and the Court finds that such endorsement was placed on the Lewis notes without the knowledge, consent or approval of plaintiffs.
'After plaintiffs had signed the collateral pledge agreement and note defendant Mercantile sent one of its representatives to the Farmers and Merchants Bank of St. Clair with the Lewis stock certificates. When said representative arrived at the Farmers and Merchants Bank he, together with plaintiff Belmont C. Johnson, went to the office of Mr. Gene Dixon, an officer of the Farmers and Merchants Bank of St. Clair, and caused him to cancel the Lewis certificates and issue new certificates in the name of plaintiff Belmont C. Johnson in the amount of 1240 shares. The representative of the defendant Mercantile then took the certificates representing the 1240 shares issued by the Farmers and Merchants Bank of St....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Trs. of Clayton Terrace Subdivision v. 6 Clayton Terrace, LLC
...banc 1949). This Court also approved the award of attorney’s fees as an exception to the American Rule in Johnson v. Mercantile Trust Co. National Ass'n, 510 S.W.2d 33, 40 (Mo. 1974) , when "the natural and proximate result of a wrong or breach of duty is to involve the wronged party in col......
-
Chrysler Corp. v. Carey
...faith incurred in protecting himself from the injurious consequence thereof are proper items of damage.'" Johnson v. Mercantile Trust Co. Nat'l Ass'n, 510 S.W.2d 33, 40 (Mo.1974) (quoting Missouri ex rel. Moore v. Morant, 266 S.W.2d 723, 727 (Mo.Ct.App.1954)). For a party to recover attorne......
-
Brown v. Mercantile Bank of Poplar Bluff, s. 17347
...involve the wronged party in collateral litigation, reasonable attorneys' fees ... are proper items of damages." Johnson v. Mercantile Trust Co., 510 S.W.2d 33, 40 (Mo.1974); Myers v. Adler, 188 Mo.App. 607, 616, 176 S.W. 538, 541 (1915). However, for a party to recover attorney fees under ......
-
Boswell v. Brinckmann
...upon rescission under such circumstances the purchaser is entitled to interest from the date of payment. Johnson v. Mercantile Trust Company National Ass'n, 510 S.W.2d 33 (Mo.1974); Cannon v. Bingman, 383 S.W.2d 169 (Mo.App.1964); Schroeder v. Zykan, 255 S.W.2d 105 (Mo.App.1953); O'Hanlon v......