Johnson v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
| Decision Date | 10 July 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 91-7363,91-7363 |
| Citation | 965 F.2d 31 |
| Parties | 122 Lab.Cas. P 57,012 Walter W. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and Dow Chemical Co., Defendant-Appellee. Summary Calendar. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
John E. Wall, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.
Karl G. Dial, Joseph C. Edwards, Fulbright & Jaworski, Dallas, Tex., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas.
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Walter W. Johnson, a former salesman for Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., appeals the dismissal of his claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against Merrell Dow on summary judgment. The district court found that the conduct Johnson describes was not extreme and outrageous and did not cause Johnson to suffer severe emotional distress. We agree and affirm.
Walter Johnson went to work as a sales representative for Merrell-National Laboratories, a division of Richardson-Merrell, Inc., in April 1976. Richardson-Merrell, Inc. was later renamed Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (Merrell Dow), and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Dow Chemical Co., (Dow). At all relevant times Johnson was an "at-will" employee. Merrell Dow terminated Johnson in July 1988.
Johnson filed this suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress and wrongful termination. Johnson's claims are based on an alleged course of harassing conduct against him by his supervisors that culminated in his termination. He theorizes that the harassment was in retaliation for his questioning some business practices of the company and his decision to testify in favor of a former Merrell Dow employee in that employee's suit against the company.
Because this case was decided on summary judgment, the acts that Johnson recites as the basis for his intentional infliction of emotional distress claim will be described in the light most favorable to Johnson, the nonmoving party. Johnson's problems started when Gena Reed was assigned as his Division Manager. According to Johnson, Reed was extremely hostile to him, constantly criticized him and threatened him with termination on numerous occasions. Reed filled out a Counseling Report which was marked as a "first warning" before termination. Johnson read this document as placing him on probation for an indefinite period. He complains that he was given no information as to how he could rectify his tenuous employment status. Reed realigned Johnson's sales territory four or five times in little over a year, assigning him less productive and less lucrative areas. She then criticized his ability to get his territories organized. On one occasion, Reed removed a $30,000 sale from Johnson's credits. The two also had numerous disputes over his record keeping and reporting; Johnson claims that she would not listen to his explanations for low sales call reports.
After Reed, Johnson worked for a series of Division Managers who treated him in a similar manner. Dave Kollman threatened him with termination when a physician reported that Johnson had left samples without obtaining the required signature. Kollman did not tell Johnson about the complaint until after 5 p.m. when the doctor's office was closed and then ordered Johnson to stay out of the dispute. It was later discovered that another doctor sharing the same office space had provided the required signature. Russ Graham, who terminated Johnson, told Johnson that he did not fit in with the company and suggested that he might be happier in another job. The Regional Manager, Pat Williams, also threatened to fire Johnson on several occasions and told Johnson that he was being disloyal to the company by maintaining a friendship with Gene Bruce, the employee on whose behalf Johnson agreed to testify.
Johnson eventually began to suffer from psychiatric problems and was placed on disability leave from Merrell Dow. While he was out sick, Graham called him on a weekly basis, asking if he was still sick and telling him that his disability was hurting the company. While Johnson was still on disability, Graham called Johnson and in an upbeat voice, asked him to come to a meeting to discuss his future with the company. When Johnson arrived for the meeting with Graham and Williams, he was promptly fired. Graham and Williams had planned the termination as evidenced by a letter sent to Johnson's psychiatrist warning him of the impending action. One of the two shoved a counseling packet at Johnson and demanded the keys to his company car. When Johnson asked how he would continue his treatment, they told him he no longer had company insurance. Johnson also alleges that someone with Merrell Dow told his current employer that Johnson had been under psychiatric care.
On Merrell Dow's motion for summary judgment, the district court dismissed both of Johnson's causes of action. The court found that the facts Johnson adduced were not sufficient to support the claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. This appeal followed.
To prevail on a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, Texas law requires the plaintiff to prove the following: (1) that the defendant acted intentionally or recklessly, (2) that the defendant's...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Munoz v. H & M WHOLESALE, INC.
...239, 243 (5th Cir. 1993); Ramirez v. Allright Parking El Paso, Inc., 970 F.2d 1372, 1375 (5th Cir.1992); Johnson v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 965 F.2d 31, 33 (5th Cir.1992); Dean v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 885 F.2d 300, 306 (5th Cir.1989); Randall's Food Mkts., Inc. v. Johnson, 891 ......
-
Wagner v. TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY
...239, 243 (5th Cir.1993); Ramirez v. Allright Parking El Paso, Inc., 970 F.2d 1372, 1375 (5th Cir.1992); Johnson v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 965 F.2d 31, 33 (5th Cir.1992); Dean v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 885 F.2d 300, 306 (5th Cir.1989); Randall's Food Mkts., Inc. v. Johnson, 891 S......
-
Patton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
...Ugalde, 990 F.2d at 243; Ramirez v. Allright Parking El Paso, Inc., 970 F.2d 1372, 1375 (5th Cir.1992); Johnson v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 965 F.2d 31, 33 (5th Cir.1992); Dean v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 885 F.2d 300, 306 (5th Cir.1989); Randall's Food Mkts., Inc. v. Johnson, 891 S......
-
Humphreys v. Medical Towers, Ltd.
...239, 243 (5th Cir.1993); Ramirez v. Allright Parking El Paso, Inc., 970 F.2d 1372, 1375 (5th Cir.1992); Johnson v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 965 F.2d 31, 33 (5th Cir.1992); Dean v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 885 F.2d 300, 306 (5th Cir.1989); Wornick Co. v. Casas, 856 S.W.2d 732, 734 (T......
-
Other Workplace Torts
...emotional distress; and • The emotional distress su൵ered by the plainti൵ was severe. See Johnson v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , 965 F.2d 31, 33 (5th Cir. 1992) (recognizing that the plaintiff must prove all four elements to establish intentional infliction of emotional distress, and......
-
Summary judgment practice
...must be able to supervise, review, criticize, demote, transfer, and discipline employees. Johnson v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals , Inc. , 965 F.2d 31, 33 (5th Cir. 1992); Wilson v. Monarch Paper Co. , 939 F.2d 1138, 1143 (5th Cir. 1991). Consequently, ordinary employment disputes cannot sus......
-
Related State Torts
...must be able to supervise, review, criticize, demote, transfer, and discipline employees.” Johnson v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , 965 F.2d 31, 34 (5th Cir. 1992). The court in GTE Southwest, Inc. v. Bruce , 998 S.W.2d 605, 612 (Tex. 1999), explained the rationale for this position a......
-
Summary Judgment Practice
...must be able to supervise, review, criticize, demote, transfer, and discipline employees. Johnson v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals , Inc. , 965 F.2d 31, 33 (5th Cir. 1992); Wilson v. Monarch Paper Co. , 939 F.2d 1138, 1143 (5th Cir. 1991). Consequently, ordinary employment disputes cannot sus......