Johnson v. Morton
Decision Date | 08 February 1902 |
Citation | 67 S.W. 790 |
Parties | JOHNSON et al. v. MORTON et al.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from district court, Collin county; J. E. Dillard, Judge.
Partition suit by W. Y. Morton and others against John Johnson, Jr., and others. From a decree in favor of complainants, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
John Johnson, Sr., and Polly Johnson were husband and wife, and were parents of seven children, two of whom, at the time of the making of the deeds hereinafter referred to, were dead, to wit, Mrs. Mattie Mack and Mrs. Mollie Morton, both of whom left children surviving them. On July 20, 1895, John Johnson, Sr., and Polly Johnson employed H. E. Smith to draw up several deeds,—one to each of his five children then living, and also to the children of their deceased daughters. Under this employment, deeds were prepared conveying the property described in the petition, the wording of each of them being the same, which deeds were duly executed and acknowledged by John and Polly Johnson. The following is a copy of one of the deeds, omitting the description of the land: This suit was instituted on the 15th day of August, 1899, by W. Y. Morton, John Morton, Merrill Morton, Joseph Morton, and James and Lula Morton, the last two being minors and suing by their next friend, all of whom are children of Mrs. Mollie Morton, deceased, against John Johnson, Jr., and others, as defendants, appellants in this court. The suit was for partition of the land. It was claimed by plaintiffs that the respective grantees in the deeds took the fee-simple title to the land. The plaintiffs recovered, and the defendants appeal.
Abernathy & Beverly, for appellants. T. S. Jackson, for appellees.
BOOKHOUT, J. (after stating the facts).
1. It is contended by appellant that the trial court erred in construing the several deeds as vesting the fee in the respective grantees therein named, and in not holding that the grantees took a life estate, only, in the land. The granting clause of the deeds reads: "Have granted, sold, and conveyed, and by these presents do grant, sell, and convey, unto the said Joseph A. Morton and Merrill...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pool v. Sneed
...Co. of Rio Grande City, Tex.Civ.App., 101 S.W.2d 389, writ refused; Frame v. Whitaker, 120 Tex. 53, 36 S.W.2d 149; Johnson v. Morton, 28 Tex.Civ.App. 296, 67 S.W. 790, writ refused; Kendall v. Clapp, 163 Mass. 69, 39 N.E. 773; Williamson v. Cowan, Tex.Civ.App., 265 S.W. 745, writ refused. H......
-
Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.
...the part of Joiner, Trustee, to assign the properties conveyed. Penick v. Eddleman, Tex.Com.App., 291 S.W. 194, 195; Johnson v. Morton, 28 Tex.Civ.App. 296, 67 S.W. 790, 791, writ In fact, these conveyances in placing the whole title in Joiner, Trustee, effectuated a merger of the legal and......
-
Utter v. Sidman
... ... 549; English v. Beehle, 32 Mo. 186; ... Jecko v. Tausig, 45 Mo. 167; Fanning v ... Doan, 128 Mo. 323; Walton v. Drumtra, supra; Johnson ... v. Morton (Tex.), 67 S.W. 790; Ray v. Spears ... (Ky.), 64 S.W. 413; White v. Deadman (Tex.), 57 ... S.W. 870; Brien v. Robinson ... ...
-
First Nat. Bank v. Wallace
...Tex. 280, 115 S. W. 1160; Lacey v. Floyd, 99 Tex. 112, 87 S. W. 665; White v. Dedmon (Tex. Civ. App.) 57 S. W. 870; Johnson v. Morton, 28 Tex. Civ. App. 296, 67 S. W. 790; Calder v. Davidson (Tex. Civ. App.) 59 S. W. 300; Hawkins v. Lee, 22 Tex. 544; Texas Co. v. Meador (Tex. Com. App.) 250......