Johnson v. Recca, Docket No. 143088.COA No. 294363.

Decision Date07 December 2011
Docket NumberDocket No. 143088.COA No. 294363.
Citation805 N.W.2d 503,490 Mich. 926
PartiesPenny Jo JOHNSON, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. John RECCA, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

490 Mich. 926
805 N.W.2d 503

Penny Jo JOHNSON, Plaintiff–Appellee,
v.
John RECCA, Defendant–Appellant.

Docket No. 143088.COA No. 294363.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Dec. 7, 2011.


Prior report: 292 Mich.App. 238, ––– N.W.2d ––––.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 5, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the issue whether MCL 500.3135(3)(c), which permits an injured person to recover excess damages for allowable expenses, work loss, and survivor's loss in third-party actions, includes within its scope the cost of replacement services rendered more than three years after the date of the motor vehicle accident.

The Michigan Association for Justice and the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Johnson v. Recca
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • 30 Julio 2012
    ...scope the cost of replacement services rendered more than three years after the date of the motor vehicle accident. Johnson v. Recca, 490 Mich. 926, 805 N.W.2d 503 (2011). 2II. STANDARD OF REVIEW We review de novo motions for summary disposition brought under MCR 2.116(C)(10). Dressel v. Am......
  • People v. Rapp, Docket Nos. 143343
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • 7 Diciembre 2011
    ...the May 10, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be [805 N.W.2d 503] briefed: (1) whether Michigan State University Ordinance 15.05 is facially unconstitutional under City of Houston v. Hill, 482 U.S. 451, 107 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT