Johnson v. Rouchleau-Ray Iron Land Co.

Decision Date07 June 1918
Docket NumberNo. 20688.,20688.
PartiesJOHNSON v. ROUCHLEAU-RAY IRON LAND CO. et al.
CourtMinnesota Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from District Court, St. Louis County; William A. Cant and Herbert A. Dancer, Judges.

Action by August Johnson against the Rouchleau-Ray Iron Land Company, the Dean Iron Company, the Arthur Mining Company, and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants Dean Iron Company and the Arthur Mining Company appeal. Reversed.

Syllabus by the Court

To recover damages for injury to real property, resulting from negligence, the owner must wait until the injury or damage has actually happened.

Damages, based upon apprehension of future injury to real property, by an act yet to happen, is too remote and speculative. Abbott, MacPherran, Lewis & Gilbert and Baldwin, Baldwin & Holmes, all of Duluth, for appellants.

Archer & Pickering, of Virginia, Minn., for respondent.

QUINN, J.

Action to recover damages for injury to real property. Plaintiff recovered a verdict of $400 against the defendants Arthur Mining Company and Dean Iron Mining Company. From a judgment entered thereon this appeal was taken.

The village of Spina is situated on the Mesaba Range, which is one of the principal iron mining districts of Northern Minnesota. A large part of the iron mining in this region is done by the system known as open pit mining. This system necessitates a stripping of the earth and other material overlaying the ore and depositing the same in dump piles in convenient localities. The defendant Arthur Iron Mining Company held a mining lease upon the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section 15, township 58 north, range 19 west, from the owners thereof. During the summer of 1912, that company entered into a contract with Butler Bros. for the stripping of a certain mine near by, and accordingly thereafter, and prior to the month of December, 1915, the strippings therefrom were placed by Butler Bros. in a dump upon the tract of land above described, which lies immediately across the highway on the west line of the village of Spina. Thereafter the defendant Dean Iron Mining Company became the owner of such lease by assignment. The plaintiff owns lots 6 and 7 in block 5 in the village of Spina, upon which is situated, at a distance of 206 feet from the toe or base of the dump in question, an 11 room two-story dwelling, in which he resides with his family. On June 13, 1916, near the northerly part of the east end of the dump a large mass of soft wet mortarlike material gushed out from the bottom of the dump across the highway and a distance of over 200 feet down one of the streets of said village, carrying with it for about 50 feet several houses with which it came in contact. The property of the plaintiff was not located upon this street, and was in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Guyan Motors v. Williams, 10219
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • February 7, 1950
    ...not when the embankment was constructed. Henry v. Ohio River R. Co., 40 W.Va. 234, 241, 21 S.E. 863. See Johnson v. Rouchleau-Ray Iron Land Co., 140 Minn. 289, 168 N.W. 1, 3 A.L.R. 679. Similarly, this Court has held that a cause of action for malpractice against a physician or a dentist ac......
  • Desrochers v. New York Cas. Co.
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • June 23, 1954
    ...neither sought nor were awarded prospective damages, the extent of which was of doubtful certainty. See Johnson v. Rouchleau-Ray Iron Land Co., 140 Minn. 289, 168 N.W. 1, 3 A.L.R. 679 and annotation following. The damages awarded, which the defendant is prepared to pay, were for injuries ca......
  • Johnson v. Rouchleau-Ray Iron Land Company
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • June 7, 1918

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT