Johnson v. State, 45598

Decision Date29 September 1970
Docket NumberNo. 45598,No. 2,45598,2
Citation122 Ga.App. 542,178 S.E.2d 42
PartiesWilliam S. JOHNSON v. The STATE
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Millard C. Farmer, Jr., Newnan, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

JORDAN, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence for simple assault.

1. A person commits a simple assault when he commits an act which places another in reasonable apprehension of immediately receiving a violent injury. Code Ann. § 26-1301; Ga.L.1968, pp. 1249, 1280. The alleged victim testified that the accused 'walked by and took me by the arm, asked me to go outside, he wanted to talk to me.' Continuing, he testified, 'He asked me if I didn't believe he'd kill me if I didn't stay away from his daughter, and he took the pistol out of his pocket and a pint bottle fell out of his pocket, and he laid the pistol on my chin.' Responding to another question, he stated, 'He went on talking, he was drinking pretty heavy, and he told me he'd kill me if I didn't stay away from his daughter.' Even though the threats accompanying the use of the pistol may have been indicative only of a conditional intent to inflict bodily harm, the circumstances also clearly disclose a situation whereby the jury could determine that the alleged victim, with a pistol pointed at him, was in reasonable apprehension of immediately receiving a violent injury. The evidence clearly supports the verdict of guilty.

2. The transcript fails to disclose any evidence to warrant instructions on justification under Code Ann. §§ 26-901, 26-902; Ga.L.1968, pp. 1249, 1272, or to show that the trial judge, in sustaining objections during the questioning of the alleged victim by counsel for the accused, deprived the accused of the benefit of a thorough and sifting cross-examination on relevant and material matters to support a defense of justification in pointing a pistol at another. Even if the alleged victim had endangered the life of the accused's daughter by the reckless driving of his automobile in which she was a passenger at some time previously to the alleged assault, this fact affords no legal justification for entering a room where the alleged victim was present, inviting him outside, and pointing a pistol at him, accompanied by threats. The second and third enumerations are without merit.

3. The accused in his unsworn statement referred to hearsay reports that the alleged victim had continued...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Patterson v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • July 14, 2016
    ...intend that his or her act place another in reasonable apprehension of immediately receiving a violent injury. See Johnson v. State , 122 Ga.App. 542, 178 S.E.2d 42 (1970). See also Brooks v. State , 144 Ga.App. 97, 99, 240 S.E.2d 593 (1977) ; Hise v. State , 127 Ga.App. 511, 194 S.E.2d 274......
  • Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Burnett
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 15, 1983
    ...Burnett's use of the pistol in this case in contemplation of law constituted an assault with a deadly weapon. Johnson v. State, 122 Ga.App. 542(1), 178 S.E.2d 42. There is no contention that Burnett accidentally pointed the weapon at Tripp. He admitted he deliberately and intentionally poin......
  • In re Interest of T. P.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • August 21, 2020
    ...a defendant pointing a gun at the victim, Overton v. State , 305 Ga. 597, 599 (2), 825 S.E.2d 159 (2019) ; Johnson v. State , 122 Ga. App. 542 (1), 178 S.E.2d 42 (1970) ; a defendant driving a vehicle at the victim, Patterson v. State , 299 Ga. 491, 495-496, 789 S.E.2d 175 (2016) ; a defend......
  • Stovall v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • April 28, 1976
    ...justified as self-defense, and the charge was not required. Howard v. State, 128 Ga.App. 807, 198 S.E.2d 334 (1973); Johnson v. State, 122 Ga.App. 542, 178 S.E.2d 42 (1970). Thus the error alleged by the defendant is rendered harmless. Any charge at all on justification benefitted rather th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT