Johnson v. State

Decision Date07 March 1990
Docket NumberNo. A90A0377,A90A0377
Citation392 S.E.2d 280,195 Ga.App. 56
PartiesJOHNSON v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

C. Jackson Burch, for appellant.

Spencer Lawton, Jr., Dist. Atty., Barry I. Mortge, Assistant Dist. Atty., for appellee.

SOGNIER, Judge.

In a bench trial, Tommy Ray Johnson was convicted of armed robbery, robbery by intimidation, fleeing and eluding, improper lane usage, and driving without insurance. He appeals from the judgment entered on the court's verdict.

1. In two enumerations of error appellant questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions for armed robbery and robbery by intimidation, contending that as to the armed robbery charge there was no weapon and no reasonable apprehension of same, and that as to the latter conviction there was no evidence of intimidation.

(a) The evidence adduced at trial established that on the night of October 23, 1988, Andrea Perry was working as a cashier at a service station and food mart in Savannah when she was approached by a man who told her he had no money and no place to go for the night. She talked with him briefly and suggested that he call a local relief organization for assistance. In response, the man said, "to keep me from shooting you, why don't you open the register and give me the money?" whereupon she gave him the cash in the register. Perry testified that while she did not see a weapon, given his statement and the way he kept one hand concealed, she assumed he had a gun. She identified appellant as the perpetrator in a photographic lineup and again at trial.

OCGA § 16-8-41(a) provides that "[a] person commits the offense of armed robbery when, with intent to commit theft, he takes property of another ... by use of an offensive weapon, or any replica, article, or device having the appearance of such weapon." The statute includes concealed offensive weapons provided there is either a physical manifestation of the weapon or some evidence from which the presence of a weapon may be inferred. Hughes v. State, 185 Ga.App. 40, 41, 363 S.E.2d 336 (1987). The question is whether the defendant's acts created a "reasonable apprehension on the part of the victim that an offensive weapon [was] being used," regardless of whether the victim actually saw the weapon. Moody v. State, 258 Ga. 818, 820(1), 375 S.E.2d 30 (1989). In the case at bar, the evidence authorized a finding that appellant robbed Perry using " 'a replica, article, or device having the appearance of (an offensive) weapon,' regardless of what it was, [so] as to create a reasonable apprehension on the part of [Perry] that it was an offensive weapon." Id.

(b) With regard to the robbery by intimidation charge, the evidence showed that Debra Smith was employed as a cashier at the same establishment on the night of November 8, 1988, when she observed someone drive slowly by the station twice and disappear around the corner. Smith testified that a man she identified as appellant then appeared at the outside window of the store and requested change for a dollar, and that when she opened the cash register he told her to give him all the money in the drawer. She stated that she was not certain that he actually had a gun, but that he had his hand in his jacket pocket and pointed at her as though he did have a weapon concealed in the pocket so that she thought he had one, and that she was "scared." Appellant was apprehended a short time later, and a search of his person revealed no offensive weapon.

A conviction for robbery by intimidation, OCGA § 16-8-40(a)(2), which is a lesser included offense of armed robbery, OCGA * 282 § 16-8-41(a), requires proof that the theft was " 'attended with such circumstances of terror--such threatening by word or gesture, as in common experience, are likely to create an apprehension of danger, and induce a [person] to part with his property for the safety of his person.' " Jackson v. State, 175 Ga.App. 843, 844(1), 334 S.E.2d 731 (1985). Here, as in Jackson, Smith's testimony concerning appellant's gestures and demands was sufficient to establish the element of intimidation. See id.; see also Ison v. State, 142 Ga.App. 783-784(2), 237 S.E.2d 17 (1977). Accordingly, we find the evidence sufficient under the standard set forth in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) to authorize appellant's conviction on both charges.

2. Appellant next contends the trial court erred by allowing the admission into evidence of his custodial statement because the evidence showed that he was under the influence of drugs at the time he gave the statement. We do not agree. The detective to whom appellant gave his statement testified that although appellant "appeared to pass out" for a few minutes while he was in custody, the detective did not believe appellant was under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time he gave the statement. Contrary to appellant's contention, in his statement he admitted having taken drugs at the time of the robberies, but did not state that he was under the influence of drugs at the time ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
26 cases
  • Oliver v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 27 Mayo 1998
    ...defendant was not guilty of armed robbery when his theft of victim's property preceded any show of force). 8. Johnson v. State, 195 Ga.App. 56, 57(1)(a), 392 S.E.2d 280 (1990) quoting Moody v. State, 258 Ga. 818, 820(1), 375 S.E.2d 30 (1989). 9. See Maddox v. State, 174 Ga.App. 728, 729-730......
  • Watkins v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 11 Marzo 1993
    ...Hicks v. State, 232 Ga. 393, 403, 207 S.E.2d 30; compare Miles v. State, 261 Ga. 232, 234(1b), 403 S.E.2d 794; Johnson v. State, 195 Ga.App. 56, 57(1), 392 S.E.2d 280; Hughes v. State, 185 Ga.App. 40, 41, 363 S.E.2d 336 (a physical manifestation of the weapon or evidence from which its pres......
  • Nelson v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 25 Junio 1998
    ...acts created a `reasonable apprehension on the part of the victim that an offensive weapon (was) being used.'" Johnson v. State, 195 Ga.App. 56, 57(1)(a), 392 S.E.2d 280 (1990). Our decision turns on the fact that under Georgia law the force essential to armed robbery must either precede or......
  • United States v. Harrison
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • 10 Enero 2023
    ...to create an apprehension of danger, and induce a person to part with his property for the safety of his person." Johnson v. State , 195 Ga.App. 56, 392 S.E.2d 280, 282 (1990) (alteration accepted) (internal quotation marks omitted). And robbery by sudden snatching occurs when "no other for......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Criminal Law - Franklin J. Hogue, Laura D. Hogue, and Marcus S. Henson
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 53-1, September 2001
    • Invalid date
    ...180. 250 Ga. App. 226, 551 S.E.2d 84 (2001). 181. Id. at 227, 551 S.E.2d at 85. 182. 185 Ga. App. 40, 363 S.E.2d 336 (1987). 183. 195 Ga. App. 56, 392 S.E.2d 280 (1990). 184. 246 Ga. App. 585, 539 S.E.2d 236 (2000). 185. Id. at 585-86, 539 S.E.2d at 237-38. 186. Id. at 585, 539 S.E.2d at 23......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT