Johnson v. State

Decision Date08 January 1996
Docket NumberNo. S95A1462,S95A1462
Citation266 Ga. 140,464 S.E.2d 806
PartiesJOHNSON v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Jimmy D. Plunkett, Thomson, for Johnson.

Dennis C. Sanders, Dist. Atty., Thomson, Hon. Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Atlanta, M. Eric Eberhardt, Asst. Dist. Atty., Thomson, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Wesley S. Horney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for the State.

SEARS, Justice.

Ralph Bell Johnson appeals from his conviction for malice murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. We affirm.

The evidence at trial showed that Johnson shot and fatally injured the victim at the latter's home. Before dying, the victim identified someone named "Ralph" as his assailant. Police contacted the victim's ex-wife, with whom Johnson had been involved, and she identified Johnson as "Ralph." Upon learning that Johnson had fled to Birmingham, Alabama, with his wife, the Birmingham police arrested him at the apartment of his stepdaughter. Immediately following the arrest, Birmingham police searched the apartment. The search uncovered a pistol, later determined to be the murder weapon, in Johnson's shaving kit, which was located in his suitcase. The Birmingham police did not have a search warrant for the apartment, but did obtain signed forms from both Johnson's stepdaughter and his wife, in which they stated they had consented to the search.

1. Having reviewed the evidence in a light most favorable to the jury's verdict, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Johnson was guilty of the crimes of which he was convicted. 1

2. Johnson claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the pistol as evidence, because it was obtained as the result of an unconstitutional warrantless search. We disagree.

The Fourth Amendment permits warrantless searches if, prior to the search, the searching officer obtains the voluntary consent of one lawfully in possession of the premises or the item to be searched. 2 Valid consent may also be given by a third party with "common authority" over the object of the search. 3 A consent to search must be the product of a free and unrestrained choice by its maker. 4 The trial court's determinations on questions of fact and credibility at a suppression hearing must be accepted unless they are clearly erroneous. 5

In this case, as evidenced by the testimony at the suppression hearing and the signed consent form, Johnson's stepdaughter gave Birmingham police permission to enter and search her apartment prior to the search. Furthermore, also evidenced by both testimony and a signed consent form, Johnson's wife, who exercised common authority over the suitcase, not only consented to the search of the suitcase, but also led the police to the suitcase, and observed the search as it was conducted. Under the totality of the circumstances surrounding this search, we find...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Raulerson v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • October 6, 1997
    ...not invoke his right to counsel is supported by the evidence and is not clearly erroneous. Therefore, we uphold it. Johnson v. State, 266 Ga. 140(2), 464 S.E.2d 806 (1996). In conclusion, we note that the evidence presented at the suppression hearing failed to demonstrate that Raulerson was......
  • Johnson v. State, A97A2467.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 20, 1998
    ...error because Johnson's wife also lived in the marital residence and had common authority over it and its contents. Johnson v. State, 266 Ga. 140, 141, 464 S.E.2d 806 (1996). She had the right to grant the State permission to search her own residence, and she had the right to lead officers ......
  • State v. Parrish, A09A2173.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 16, 2010
    ...769-770, 605 S.E.2d 406 (2004) (same); State v. Gay, 269 Ga.App. 331, 334, 604 S.E.2d 572 (2004) (same). Compare Johnson v. State, 266 Ga. 140, 140-141(2), 464 S.E.2d 806 (1996) (wife who had common authority over suitcase could consent to its search); Walsh, 236 Ga.App. at 561(2), 512 S.E.......
  • Horton v. State, A04A1554.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 1, 2004
    ...274 Ga. 246, 252(8), 551 S.E.2d 723 (2001). 7. See State v. West, 237 Ga.App. 185, 514 S.E.2d 257 (1999). 8. Johnson v. State, 266 Ga. 140, 141 n. 6, 464 S.E.2d 806 (1996); Lane v. State, 250 Ga.App. 160, 162, n. 7, 549 S.E.2d 468 (2001). 9. See Gosier v. State, 241 Ga.App. 384, 386(1), 526......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT