Johnson v. State

Decision Date03 October 1980
Docket NumberNo. 36567,36567
Citation271 S.E.2d 789,246 Ga. 474
PartiesJOHNSON v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Stephen H. Harris, Savannah, for appellant.

Andrew J. Ryan, III, Dist. Atty., Robert M. Hitch, III, Asst. Dist. Atty., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

MARSHALL, Justice.

The appellant's convictions of murder, rape, kidnapping and aggravated assault, and his sentences, including a death sentence for the murder, were affirmed by this court in Johnson v. State, 242 Ga. 649, 250 S.E.2d 394 (1978). The present appeal is from the order denying his "extraordinary motion for extraordinary relief," which motion was predicated on the allegedly newly discovered evidence that his murder indictment had gone into the jury room with the not guilty plea and verdict of his co-indictee 1 masked. Even if this nonexistent appellate remedy be treated as an extraordinary motion for new trial, it is not shown that this is evidence that is newly discovered. Moreover, even if it was "newly discovered evidence," the motion showed no harmful error.

The general rule in this state is that where a former verdict (as involving a co-indictee) appears upon the indictment, the better practice is to cover, erase or in some way conceal the former verdict from the jury, but that this is a right which can be waived by failure to request it, and, in such event, there is no reversible error where the jury is instructed not to consider such verdict. See Smalls v. State, 105 Ga. 669(6), 31 S.E. 571 (1898) (a murder case); Corbin v. State, 212 Ga. 231(2), 91 S.E.2d 764 (1956) (a death case); Salem v. State, 228 Ga. 186, 188(5), 184 S.E.2d 650 (1971); Riggins v. Stynchcombe, 231 Ga. 589, 593, 203 S.E.2d 208 (1974); Bostick v. Ricketts, 236 Ga. 304(1), 223 S.E.2d 686 (1976); Page v. State, 120 Ga.App. 709(1), 172 S.E.2d 207 (1969); Chandler v. State, 143 Ga.App. 608, 610(6), 239 S.E.2d 158 (1977); Lockett v. State, 153 Ga.App. 569, 571(3), 266 S.E.2d 236 (1980).

The appellant urges several reasons for not applying this rule in his case, in which no request for concealment was made. He contends that it should not apply in a death case, yet it was so applied in Corbin v. State, 212 Ga. 231, 91 S.E.2d 764, supra, a death case. With mandatory review by this court in death cases, no reason appears for an exception in such cases.

He urges a distinction in Corbin in that the former verdict there was completely sealed by a cardboard stapled over it, whereas in the present case the former verdict was covered merely by paper, which allegedly could be held up to the light and read through, and was stapled only on the sides, allegedly permitting the jurors to peek under the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Johnson v. Kemp
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • April 24, 1985
    ...the convictions, Johnson v. State, 240 Ga. 649, 250 S.E.2d 394 (1978); denied a motion for extraordinary relief, Johnson v. State, 246 Ga. 474, 271 S.E.2d 789 (1980); and affirmed the denial of habeas corpus, Johnson v. Zant, 249 Ga. 812, 295 S.E.2d 63, cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1228, 103 S.Ct......
  • Johnson v. Zant, 38819
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 10, 1982
    ...also filed an extraordinary motion for "extraordinary relief", which was denied and on appeal to this court affirmed. Johnson v. State, 246 Ga. 474, 271 S.E.2d 789 (1980). Johnson's petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied in March 1982. We granted his application for a certificate o......
  • Galloway v. Board of Com'rs of Banks County
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • October 3, 1980
    ... ... 473] David C. Jones, Jr., Homer, for appellants ...         Joseph A. Griggs, Cornelia, Jack S. Davidson, Jefferson, Albert Sidney Johnson, Benning M. Grice, Jr., Atlanta, for appellees ...         [246 Ga. 472] MARSHALL, Justice ...         This is an action for ... The petitions, pleadings, and judgments in each proceeding state that the county is bringing the condemnation proceeding in the exercise of its power of eminent domain under Ga.L.1964, p. 234 et seq. (Code Ch ... ...
  • Flowers v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 11, 1981
    ...appellant waived any concealment of the objectionable portions of the indictment by his failure to timely object. Johnson v. State, 246 Ga. 474, 271 S.E.2d 789 (1980); Bostick v. Ricketts, 236 Ga. 304(1), 223 S.E.2d 686 (1976); Lockett v. State, 153 Ga.App. 569(3), 266 S.E.2d 236 (1980). Fu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT