Johnson v. State, 76170

Decision Date07 April 1988
Docket NumberNo. 76170,76170
Citation368 S.E.2d 562,186 Ga.App. 801
PartiesJOHNSON v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Carl Greenberg, Atlanta, for appellant.

Robert E. Wilson, Dist. Atty., Helen A. Pryles, R. Stephen Roberts, Barbara B. Conroy, Asst. Dist. Attys., for appellees.

BIRDSONG, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Marvin Jerome Johnson, appeals his conviction of armed robbery. On the evening of August 30, 1986, two black men robbed the Taco Bell restaurant of more than $1,000, after accosting the restaurant shift manager at knife-point. The two men, one of whom had a halloween mask sitting on top of his head, fled after the manager was put in a closet. Minutes later the police were alerted. A halloween mask was found by the door. Sergeant Davis of the DeKalb County Police Department observed a 1973 Pontiac automobile within 150-200 yards of the Taco Bell. The vehicle had its windows rolled down and a warm hood. Sergeant Davis, using his flashlight, looked inside the vehicle and observed an open knife, some Taco Bell cups with loose and rolled-up coins, and certain other items. The vehicle was towed in.

Appellant previously had purchased the Pontiac automobile from a man named Cox, but Cox had retained the title to the vehicle pending payment in full. On September 1, 1986, appellant visited Cox and asked his assistance in recovering his automobile which appellant stated had broken down and apparently had been towed away. Initial efforts to recover the car were unsuccessful. In the meantime the police learned that Cox was the apparent owner of the car and contacted him. Subsequently appellant was arrested and made a statement. In the statement, appellant claims that he went to visit a friend, the friend was not home, his car broke down, he left it with the windows open, and when he returned the car was gone. At trial, the Taco Bell manager testified that Cox was not one of the men who robbed him. Cox denied any participation in the robbery, and identified a halloween mask, similar to the one used in the robbery and found in the car, as a mask that his son could have left in the car when it was sold. The manager of Taco Bell made a positive in-court identification of appellant as one of the robbery participants. Held:

1. Appellant's first enumerated error is on the general grounds that the verdict is contrary to the evidence, against the weight of the evidence, and is contrary to law and principles of justice and equity. This enumeration of error is without merit. Our review of the transcript in a light most favorable to the jury's verdict "reveals ample evidence from which any rational trier of fact could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant was guilty of [the offense] charged." Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560.

2. Appellant's second enumerated error is that the trial court erred in finding that appellant's statement was given voluntarily. Specifically, appellant asserts that his statement is not admissible as it has not been shown that he waived his rights of silence and counsel, and that such waiver cannot be implied from the fact that a statement was given. Further, appellant asserts that appellant's refusal to sign a written waiver invokes his right to silence.

Appellant relies, in part, on this court's determination in Colbert v. State, 124 Ga.App. 283, 183 S.E.2d 476. The facts of this case are distinguishable from those in Colbert. Regarding appellant's assertion that his refusal to sign a written waiver automatically invokes his right to silence, we disagree. Whether a failure to sign a written waiver constitutes such an invocation depends upon the existing circumstances. See generally Mitchell v. State, 254 Ga. 353(7), 329 S.E.2d 481 (appellant's declination to sign a written waiver did not prevent State from carrying...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Mathis v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 8 Septiembre 1989
    ...made by the trial judge and must be accepted by appellate courts unless such determinations are clearly erroneous." Johnson v. State, 186 Ga.App. 801, 803, 368 S.E.2d 562; accord Snipes v. State, 188 Ga.App. 366, 368, 373 S.E.2d 48; Walker v. State, 186 Ga.App. 765(2), 368 S.E.2d 3. Appella......
  • Peabody v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 14 Febrero 1989
    ...trial judge and must be accepted by appellate courts unless such determinations are clearly erroneous. [Cits.]" Johnson v. State, 186 Ga.App. 801, 803, 368 S.E.2d 562 (1988). 2. Appellant contends the trial court erred by denying his motion for a new trial because the evidence was insuffici......
  • Dillman v. State, A91A1458
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 30 Octubre 1991
    ...waive his rights after being properly advised of them. Lane v. State, 247 Ga. 19, 20(3), 273 S.E.2d 397 (1981); Johnson v. State, 186 Ga.App. 801, 803, 368 S.E.2d 562 (1988); see Golden v. State, 163 Ga.App. 629, 631(2), 295 S.E.2d 144 Judgment affirmed. SOGNIER, C.J., and McMURRAY, P.J., c......
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 22 Mayo 1989
    ...by the trial judge and must be accepted by appellate courts unless such determinations are clearly erroneous." Johnson v. State, 186 Ga.App. 801, 803, 368 S.E.2d 562 (1988). We find the trial court did not err in admitting defendant's custodial 2. Given defendant's custodial statements and ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT