Johnson v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.
| Decision Date | 05 June 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 7418SC244,7418SC244 |
| Citation | 22 N.C.App. 8,205 S.E.2d 353 |
| Parties | Doris Overman JOHNSON, Administratrix of the Estate of Jack Johnson, Deceased v. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST CO., Executor of the Estate of Raiford D. Baxley, Deceased. |
| Court | North Carolina Court of Appeals |
Edwards, Greeson & Toumaras by Harold F. Greeson, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellant.
Henson, Donahue & Elrod by Joseph E. Elrod, III, Greensboro, for defendant-appellee.
G.S. § 28--173 provides in pertinent part:
'When the death of a person is caused by a wrongful act, neglect or default of another, such as would, if the injured party had lived, have entitled him to an action for damages therefor, the person or corporation that would have been so liable, and his or their executors, administrators, collectors or successors shall be liable to an action for damages, to be brought by the executor, administrator or collector of the decedent, . . .'
A wrongful death action cannot be maintained by a foreign administratrix and commencement of a wrongful death action in North Carolina by a foreign administrator will not operate to bar the running of the applicable two-year statute of limitations set forth in G.S. § 1--53(4), such action being a nullity and subject to dismissal. Merchants Distributors, Inc. v. Hutchinson and Lewis v. Hutchinson, 16 N.C.App. 655, 193 S.E.2d 436 (1972); Monfils v. Hazelwood, 218 N.C. 215, 10 S.E.2d 673 (1940); Reid v. Smith, 5 N.C.App. 646, 169 S.E.2d 14 (1969).
G.S. § 1--22, which extends the statute of limitations in suits against a defendant's estate up to one year after the issuance of letters of administration for said defendant's estate, is also of no avail to plaintiff in this case since she did not qualify and file suit within that time limit. Finally, plaintiff's qualification on 2 May 1973 will not relate back to the filing of the suit where no attempt has been made to qualify as administrator in North Carolina. Reid v. Smith, Supra. This case is distinguishable from Graves v. Welborn, 26 N.C. 688, 133 S.E.2d 761 (1963), in that there the plaintiff attempted to qualify and did qualify in every respect except having the signature of the surety on the surety bond. In Graves v. Welborn, Supra, the Court stated:
'. . . However, we must not be understood as holding that one who has never applied for letters or who, having applied, had no reasonable grounds for believing that he had been duly appointed, can institute an action for...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Davis v. Piper Aircraft Corp.
...this would defeat the limitations bar. See, e. g., Graves v. Welborn, 260 N.C. 688, 133 S.E.2d 761 (1963); Johnson v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 22 N.C.App. 8, 205 S.E.2d 353 (1974). On the other hand, the longstanding weight of federal authority would give relation back effect to such an a......
-
Burcl v. North Carolina Baptist Hosp., Inc.
...until 14 September 1979.2 These were Sims v. REA Construction Co., 25 N.C.App. 472, 213 S.E.2d 398 (1975); Johnson v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 22 N.C.App. 8, 205 S.E.2d 353 (1974); Merchants Distributors, Inc. v. Hutchinson, 16 N.C.App. 655, 193 S.E.2d 436 (1972); and Reid v. Smith, 5 N.C......
-
Ricard v. Birch
...filing of the complaint. This result was reached by application of the North Carolina rule, most recently stated in Johnson v. Trust Co., 22 N.C.App. 8, 205 S.E.2d 353 (1974), that an action filed by a non-resident administrator is a nullity, to which there can be no relation back. The cour......
-
Burcl v. North Carolina Baptist Hospital, Inc.
...substitution of the resident administrator would not relate back and validate the present unauthorized action. Johnson v. Trust Co., 22 N.C.App. 8, 205 S.E.2d 353 (1974). It follows that the trial court did not err in refusing to substitute the resident administrator as party plaintiff and ......