Johnson v. Wade, 75046

Decision Date29 October 1987
Docket NumberNo. 75046,75046
PartiesJOHNSON et al. v. WADE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Daniel T. Donohue, Atlanta, for appellants.

Richard B. Eason, Jr., Atlanta, for appellee.

POPE, Judge.

Plaintiffs filed suit against defendant on May 22, 1985, seeking damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained when defendant collided with the car in which they were traveling. Defendant answered and filed a counterclaim against two of the plaintiffs. Defendant subsequently served each of the plaintiffs with requests for admissions, requests for production of documents and interrogatories. Plaintiffs responded to the requests for admissions, but failed to respond to the remaining discovery.

On January 23, 1987 defendant filed a Motion for Imposition of Sanctions based on plaintiffs' failure to respond to the discovery, seeking, inter alia, the dismissal of plaintiffs' complaint. See OCGA § 9-11-37 (b) and (d). Plaintiffs never responded to defendant's motion and a hearing was neither requested nor held. On February 17, 1987 one of the plaintiffs (the driver of the car) filed a dismissal with prejudice as to her claims only. On March 24, 1987 the remaining plaintiffs filed a voluntary dismissal pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-41 (a). On March 23, 1987 the trial court signed an order granting defendant's motion for sanctions and dismissing plaintiffs' claims with prejudice; however, the order was not filed until March 30, 1987. Plaintiffs appeal, contending that the trial court's order, filed after their voluntary dismissal pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-41 (a), was a nullity. Held :

1. Pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-41 (a) a plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss his action, without order or permission of the trial court, any time before he rests his case. However, " 'the announcement by a trial judge of a decision that will terminate a civil case, though that decision has not been formally reduced to writing and entered, will preclude the filing of a voluntary dismissal after the announcement but before the judgment is actually entered by the trial judge. Jones v. Burton, 238 Ga. 394, 396 (233 SE2d 367) (1977).' " (Punctuation omitted.) Pizza Ring Enterprises v. Mills Mgt. Sources, 154 Ga.App. 45(2), 267 S.E.2d 487 (1980). " 'It is knowledge of the actual, not of the possible, result of a case which precludes the exercise of the right of dismissal.' " Groves v. Groves, 250 Ga. 459, 298 S.E.2d 506 (1983).

Plaintiffs contend that they had no knowledge of the court's decision granting defendant's motion for sanctions and dismissing their action with prejudice at the time they filed their voluntary dismissal. Defendant maintains, however, that plaintiffs acquired knowledge of the trial court's intention to grant the motion on March 13, 1987, as evidenced by a letter attached to defendant's brief. Pretermitting the question of whether that letter, addressed to the trial court and written by defendant's counsel, and which references a "proposed Order" for the court's "consideration," imputed knowledge to plaintiffs of the trial court's decision to dismiss plaintiffs' action with prejudice, this evidence cannot be considered in support of defendant's assertion that plaintiffs had knowledge of the trial court's decision prior to the filing of their dismissal. " 'A brief [or attachment thereto] cannot be used in lieu of the record or transcript for adding evidence to the record. (Cits.) We must take our evidence from the record and not from the brief of either party.' Blue v. R.L. Glosson Contracting, 173 Ga.App. 622(1) (327 SE2d 582) (1985)." Johnson v. Medlin, 178 Ga.App. 650, 651, 344 S.E.2d 504 (1986).

Moreover, although the trial court's order was signed on March 23, 1987, the day before plaintiffs filed their dismissal, we find no evidence that p...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Leary v. Julian, A96A2482
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 13, 1997
    ...to an order to be effective against the parties or the plaintiff's right to dismiss the claim. Jones, supra; Johnson v. Wade, 184 Ga.App. 675, 676(1), 362 S.E.2d 469 (1987). As the Supreme Court emphasized in Groves v. Groves, 250 Ga. 459, 298 S.E.2d 506 (1983), knowledge of the actual, as ......
  • Crawford v. Spencer
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 17, 1995
    ...part of the official trial record. See Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bogan, 194 Ga.App. 824, 826, 392 S.E.2d 33; Johnson v. Wade, 184 Ga.App. 675, 676, 362 S.E.2d 469. 2. The applicable summary judgment standard is that of Lau's Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491, 405 S.E.2d 3. OCGA § 9-3-71(a)......
  • N. Druid Dev., LLC v. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc., A14A1101.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 7, 2014
    ...Classic Cars, 261 Ga. 182, 402 S.E.2d 723 (1991), ASAP Healthcare Network, 270 Ga.App. 76, 606 S.E.2d 98, and Johnson v. Wade, 184 Ga.App. 675, 362 S.E.2d 469 (1987). None of these cases, however, hold that a trial court may rule on a motion seeking the sanction of dismissal without affordi......
  • First Media Grp., Inc. v. Doe
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 17, 2011
    ...at (a)(3). 2. McGhee v. Jones, 287 Ga.App. 345, 347(2), 652 S.E.2d 163 (2007). 3. OCGA § 9–11–41(a)(1)(A). 4. Johnson v. Wade, 184 Ga.App. 675, 676(1), 362 S.E.2d 469 (1987) (quoting Jones v. Burton, 238 Ga. 394, 396(1), 233 S.E.2d 367 (1977)). 5. Id. (citing Groves v. Groves, 250 Ga. 459(1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT