Joles v. State, 57500
Citation | 563 S.W.2d 619 |
Decision Date | 29 March 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 57500,No. 3,57500,3 |
Parties | Spencer JOLES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee |
Court | Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas |
Frank B. Murchison, Corsicana, on appeal only, for appellant.
Pat Batchelor, Dist. Atty., W. D. Ralston, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Corsicana, for the State.
Before ROBERTS, PHILLIPS and VOLLERS, JJ.
Appellant waived trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty before the court to an indictment charging him with a subsequent offense of driving an automobile over and upon a public road in Navarro County while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The punishment was assessed at imprisonment for three years.
The appeal is before us on the following four grounds of error:
We overrule these contentions and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Art. 6701l -2, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St., provides:
"Any person who has been convicted of the misdemeanor offense of driving or operating an automobile or other motor vehicle upon any public road or highway in this state, or upon any street or alley within an incorporated city, town or village, while intoxicated or under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and who shall thereafter drive or operate an automobile or other motor vehicle upon any public road or highway in this state, or upon any street or alley within the limits of an incorporated city, town or village, while such person is intoxicated or under the influence of intoxicating liquor, shall for each and every subsequent such violation be guilty of a felony; and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not less than One Hundred ($100.00) Dollars nor more than Five Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars or confinement in the county jail not less than ten (10) days nor more than two (2) years, or by both such fine and imprisonment, or by confinement in the state penitentiary not to exceed five (5) years."
In his first ground of error appellant argues that, since the indictment alleged that appellant drove an automobile "over and upon a public road" in Navarro County, the conviction cannot stand, because the proof showed that appellant was arrested within the city limits of Corsicana by the Corsicana City Police. He further argues that, to properly charge appellant with the offense under the instant case, the indictment should have alleged that appellant drove his automobile upon a street or alley within the incorporated city limits of Corsicana.
Appellant's first contention was decided adversely to him in the case of White v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 69, 95 S.W.2d 429 (1936). There it is stated:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Ramirez v. State
-
Bell v. State
...data and evidence before it to reform the judgment on appeal. See Knight v. State, 581 S.W.2d 692 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); Joles v. State, 563 S.W.2d 619 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Vasquez v. State, 477 S.W.2d 629 (Tex.Cr.App.1972). In light of Williams and the authorities cited therein, we hold that the......
-
Martinez v. State, 04-81-00104-CR
...has the necessary data and evidence before it for reformation, the judgment and sentence may be reformed on appeal. Joles v. State, 563 S.W.2d 619 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Vasquez v. State, 477 S.W.2d 629 Pursuant to our authority under Tex.Code Crim.Pro.Ann. art. 44.24(b) (Vernon Supp.1981), the......
-
Livingston v. State, No. 14-06-01031-CR (Tex. App. 5/29/2008), 14-06-01031-CR.
...directly addressed this issue and held that prior convictions may be used to enhance, no matter how remote. See Joles v. State, 563 S.W.2d 619, 621-22 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978) (holding that a previous DWI conviction could be used for enhancement purposes, no matter how remote); Hicks v. State......