Jones' Unknown Heirs v. Dorchester
Decision Date | 23 June 1920 |
Docket Number | (No. 1657.) |
Citation | 224 S.W. 596 |
Parties | JONES' UNKNOWN HEIRS et al. v. DORCHESTER et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Grayson County; Silas Hare, Judge.
Suit by C. B. Dorchester and others against Wilson N. Jones' unknown heirs and others. From judgment rendered, the defendants appeal. Affirmed.
C. H. Elting, of Durant, Okl., and Wolfe & Freeman, of Sherman, for appellant January.
Jordan & Burke, of Hugo, Okl., and Randell & Randell, of Sherman, for appellants Griggs, Le Flore, Hampton, and Sophie Jones.
J. F. McMurray, of McAllester, Okl., Wood, Jones & Hassell, of Sherman, and Crane & Crane, of Dallas, for appellants J. P. Jones and Mrs. A. M. Jones.
McReynolds & Hay, of Sherman, for interveners Edward Slaton, Lizzie Slaton, Kennedy, Roe and wife, and Paris and wife.
Head, Dillard, Smith, Maxey & Head, of Sherman, for appellees Dorchester, Davis, and Strother.
On the 1st day of December, 1917, C. B. Dorchester, Tom Randolph, J. G. Davis, and J. B. Strother brought this suit in the district court of Grayson county, complaining of the unknown heirs of Wilson N. Jones, deceased, the unknown heirs of Nat Jones, deceased, Mrs. A. N. Jones and her husband, J. P. Jones, Callie Marguerite Jones, a minor, alleging in substance that about the 13th day of September, 1900, Wilson N. Jones, being a citizen of the Choctaw Nation, in the then Indian Territory, and a resident of Grayson county, Tex., made his last will and testament, a copy of which is attached to the petition, that about the 11th day of June, 1901, the said Wilson N. Jones departed this life, and that his will was in September thereafter duly probated in the county court of Grayson county. Tom Randolph, C. B. Dorchester, D. E. Bryant, Tom L. Griggs, and F. C. Dillard were appointed independent executors of the will. Griggs and Dillard declined to qualify. Bryant had died before the institution of the suit, but Randolph and Dorchester continued to act as independent executors. Among others the will contained the following paragraphs:
It was further alleged that at the date of his death Wilson N. Jones had no children and no grandchildren save a grandson, Nat Jones; that he was survived by his second wife, Eliza Belle Jones, the stepgrandmother of Nat Jones; that by his will he undertook to convey all of the property owned by himself and his wife Eliza Belle Jones; that she had previously agreed to such disposition of her interest in the community estate; she had agreed to take under the will the interest bequeathed to her; that after the death of the testator she repented that she had made this agreement, and, instead of accepting under the will, claimed her interest in the property, which seems to have been conceded to be practically one-half under the community law of the Choctaw Nation, which it was alleged was similar to that of Texas; that Nat Jones died when he was about 29 years of age, leaving no lawful descendants, and no brothers or sisters, but leaving his mother as sole heir; that at the date of the execution of the will...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Parsons v. Childs
... ... David B. Childs and Herbert V. Jones, Trustees of the Mary Atkins Residuary Estate No. 36094Supreme Court of ... consequently the residue of the estate reverts to the heirs ... of Mary Atkins. In re White's Trust, 33 Ch. Div ... 449; Teele v ... In re Peabody's Estate, 154 Cal. 173, 97 P. 184; ... Jones' Unknown Heirs v. Dorchester, 224 S.W ... 596; Eaton v. Missionary Society, 264 ... ...
-
Parsons v. Childs, 36094.
...of works of art and the support of the museum. In re Peabody's Estate, 154 Cal. 173, 97 Pac. 184; Jones' Unknown Heirs v. Dorchester, 224 S.W. 596; Eaton v. Missionary Society, 264 Ill. 88, 105 N.E. 746; In re MacDowell's Will, 217 N.Y. 454, 112 N.E. 177. (a) Definition of a "Charity." Mo. ......
-
In re Young
...the evident intention in the use of that language, when read in connection with the other provisions." Jones' Unknown Heirs v. Dorchester, 224 S.W. 596, 603 (Tex.Civ.App.-Amarillo 1920). "When a dominant or general intent is disclosed by the entire will, and a particular or special intent i......
-
Gordon v. City of Baltimore
...v. Woodward, 141 Me. 28, 38 A.2d 657 (1944); National Bank of Greece v. Savarika, 167 Miss. 571, 148 So. 649 (1933); Jones' Unknown Heirs v. Dorchester, 224 S.W. 596 (Tex.Ct. of Civ.App. We have been referred to, and have found no Maryland case which invokes this principle nor are we inclin......