Jones v. Com.
| Decision Date | 27 January 1967 |
| Citation | 411 S.W.2d 37 |
| Parties | Robert JONES, Jr., Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky |
John T. Fowler, Louisville, for appellant.
Robert Matthews, Atty. Gen., John B. Browning, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, Edwin Schroering, Commonwealth's Atty., Louisville, for appellee.
CULLEN, Commissioner.
In Jones v. Commonwealth, Ky., 389 S.W.2d 927, this Court directed the Jefferson Circuit Court (Criminal Branch, First Division) to grant Robert Jones, Jr. a hearing on his RCr 11.42 motion seeking to vacate a 1962 judgment under which, upon his plea of guilty to a charge of robbery, he had been sentenced to an eight-year term in the penitentiary. The allegations which we held to require a hearing were that court-appointed counsel refused to defend Jones if he would not plead guilty, and that the plea was made under duress.
In accordance with the direction of this Court the circuit court appointed counsel for Jones and granted him a full hearing, at which a considerable amount of testimony was taken. At the conclusion of the hearing the court found that there had been no duress or coercion--only reasonable persuasion. The court found also that Jones' counsel for the trial had not refused to defend Jones if he would not plead guilty. Accordingly, the court overruled the motion.
The findings are amply supported by the evidence. Jones was in a precarious position. He was charged with armed robbery. On a previous trial he had been found guilty and the jury had imposed the death penalty. This conviction had been reversed on appeal (in an unpublished opinion), but only for trial errors and not on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence. The record on the 11.42 hearing indicates that Jones' counsel and friends simply pointed out to him the serious danger of his being given another sentence of death, stated to him their belief that his interests would best be served if he were to plead guilty to a reduced charge of plain robbery, and pleaded with him to take the latter course. The record does not warrant a conclusion that there was any duress or coercion other than that inherent in the predicament in which Jones had placed himself. We find nothing to indicate that there were pressures or inducements such as would make it unfair to hold Jones to his plea. Cf. Higbee v. Thomas, Ky., 376 S.W.2d 305.
It is our opinion that the circuit court properly overruled Jones' motion.
The appointed counsel for Jones moved ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fraser v. Com., 1999-SC-0846-DG.
...Ky., 400 S.W.2d 209, 211-212 (1966) ("We think it is appropriate for the time to defer to legislative action."); Jones v. Commonwealth, Ky., 411 S.W.2d 37, 38 (1967) ("[W]e note that the General Assembly has not had an opportunity since publication of the opinion in Warner to act upon the p......
-
Williamson v. Vardeman
...denied, 382 U.S. 978, 86 S.Ct. 550, 15 L.Ed.2d 469 (1966); Daines v. Markoff, 92 Nev. 582, 555 P.2d 490, 493 (1970); Jones v. Commonwealth, 411 S.W.2d 37 (Ky.1967); Warner v. Commonwealth, 400 S.W.2d 209, 211-12 (Ky.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 858, 87 S.Ct. 108, 17 L.Ed.2d 85 and 385 U.S. 885......
-
Jones v. Com.
...that the Bar should no longer be expected to carry it. However, we chose then to defer to legislative action. In 1967, in Jones v. Commonwealth, Ky., 411 S.W.2d 37, we noted that the General Assembly had not had an opportunity since the publication of Warner to act on the problem, so we aga......
-
Com., Dept. of Corrections v. Burke
...the judiciary has This very serious problem has been before us recently in Warner v. Commonwealth, Ky., 400 S.W.2d 209, and Jones v. Commonwealth, Ky., 411 S.W.2d 37. In both cases we expressed our intention to defer to legislative action. It is almost a matter of necessity that we do no fu......