Jones v. Conn. Med. Examining Bd..
| Citation | 28 A.3d 338,302 Conn. 921 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Decision Date | 14 September 2011 |
| Parties | Charles Ray JONES, M.D.v.CONNECTICUT MEDICAL EXAMINING BOARD. |
302 Conn. 921
28 A.3d 338
Charles Ray JONES, M.D.
v.
CONNECTICUT MEDICAL EXAMINING BOARD.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Decided Sept. 14, 2011.
Elliott B. Pollack and Megan Youngling Carannante, Hartford, in support of the petition.Tanya Feliciano DeMattia, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 129 Conn.App. 575, 19 A.3d 1264, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the department of public health was required to prove its case in proceedings before the Connecticut medical examining board by a preponderance of the evidence, rather than by clear and convincing evidence?”
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Gonzalez v. State Elections Enforcement Comm'n
...omitted.) Jones v. Connecticut Medical Examining Board, 129 Conn. App. 575, 581, 19 A.3d 1264, cert. granted on other grounds, 302 Conn. 921, 28 A.3d 338 (2011). "Our review of an agency's factual determination is constrained by . . . § 4-183 (j), which mandates that a court shall not subst......
-
Matthew M. v. Dep't of Children & Families
...Board, 129 Conn. App. 575, 581-84, 19 A.3d 1264 (violation of statutory notice requirements), cert. granted on other grounds, 302 Conn. 921, 28 A.3d 338 (2011). Because the plaintiff is not alleging a violation of § 4-181, we conclude that the burden was on the plaintiff to prove prejudice.......