Jones v. Dowdy, 83-926

Decision Date11 January 1984
Docket NumberNo. 83-926,83-926
Citation443 So.2d 467
PartiesGloria Dawn JONES, Appellant, v. Darlene DOWDY and Munford, Inc., d/b/a Majik Market, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

C. Daniel Akes, Lakeland, for appellant.

H. Vance Smith and Ted R. Manry, III, of MacFarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellees.

CAMPBELL, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of appellee, Munford, Inc., a defendant below. Appellant, Gloria Dawn Jones, sued appellee for its alleged failure to use due care to protect appellant against damages caused by the negligent or wrongful acts of third persons which appellee should have reasonable cause to anticipate. We affirm.

Appellee is the owner of numerous neighborhood convenience stores known as Majik Markets. Appellant was a customer who was shopping inside one of appellee's stores. Appellee's store was typical of most convenience stores. It had an enclosed glass front with a sidewalk about ten to twelve feet wide along the length of the front of the building. The sidewalk was raised about six inches above the level of the parking lot also in front of the store. The edge of the sidewalk bordering the parking area was painted yellow. Appellant was injured when an automobile driven by Darlene Dowdy crossed over the sidewalk and crashed through the glass front of appellee's store. This case is virtually identical to Schatz v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 128 So.2d 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961). We affirm the summary judgment for appellee on the authority of Schatz.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Graham v. Langley
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 13 Diciembre 1996
    ...a vehicle through the glass window of a commercial business is not legally foreseeable. This case is identical to Jones v. Dowdy, 443 So.2d 467 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) and Schatz v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 128 So.2d 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961). In both cases, the district courts held that although store own......
  • Molinares v. El Centro Gallego, Inc., s. 87-2148
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 6 Junio 1989
    ...1979); Krispy Kreme Doughnut Co. v. Cornett, 312 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert. denied, 330 So.2d 16 (Fla.1976); Jones v. Dowdy, 443 So.2d 467 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). We recognize that the result we reach in this case would be different if the sidewalk in front of the defendant's restaura......
  • Parish v. L.M. Daigle Oil Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • 23 Junio 1999
    ...store. 128 So.2d at 902. The vehicle struck and injured a business patron located inside the store. Id. Likewise, both Jones v. Dowdy. 443 So.2d 467 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), and Krispy Kreme Doughnut Co. v. Cornett, 312 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), cert, denied, 330 So.2d 16 (Fla.1976), involv......
  • Dennis v. City of Tampa, 90-01875
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 29 Mayo 1991
    ...from a possessor of land who has actual or constructive knowledge of a third person's dangerous conduct. See, e.g., Jones v. Dowdy, 443 So.2d 467 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Elmore v. Sones, 140 So.2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962); Kolosky v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 472 So.2d 891 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), revi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT