Jones v. Feiger, Collison & Killmer
| Decision Date | 29 December 1994 |
| Citation | 903 P.2d 27 |
| Docket Number | 93CA1709 |
| Parties | 10 IER Cases 344 George JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEIGER, COLLISON & KILLMER, Defendant-Appellee. . V |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 cases
-
Nehad v. Mukasey
...the client refuses an offer of settlement, see, e.g., Compton v. Kittleson, 171 P.3d 172, 173 (Alaska 2007); Jones v. Feiger, Collison & Killmer, 903 P.2d 27, 34 (Colo.Ct.App. 1994) (holding that retainer provision under which, inter alia, lawyer could withdraw if client rejected settlement......
-
Jacobsen v. Oliver
...counsel. There was no violation of the public policies embodied in Rule 1.16(a)(3). 10. Mr. Jacobsen relies on Jones v. Feiger, Collison & Killmer, 903 P.2d 27 (Colo.Ct.App. 1994) to resist this conclusion. In that case, the Colorado Court of Appeals reviewed a contingent fee agreement betw......
-
Serna v. Kingston Enterprises
...that would deprive a client of the right to control settlement is unenforceable as against public policy. See Jones v. Feiger, Collison & Killmer, 903 P.2d 27 (Colo.App.1994), rev'd on other grounds, 926 P.2d 1244 Here, Serna gave her right to settle this litigation to the passengers, and t......
-
Feiger, Collison & Killmer v. Jones
...for Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. Justice MULLARKEY delivered the Opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari in Jones v. Feiger, Collison & Killmer, 903 P.2d 27 (Colo.App.1994), to review the court of appeals' reversal of the jury verdict in that case. Because we hold that the court of appe......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
§4.5 RPC 1.16: Terminating the Attorney-Client Relationship
...to give the law firm the right to withdraw if the client rejects a reasonable settlement offer. E.g., Jones v. Feiger, Collison & Killmer, 903 P.2d 27, 34-35 (Colo. App. 319.RPC 1.16(b)(4), (6)); e.g., Kannewurf v. Johns, 632 N.E.2d 711, 715-17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). See generally LMPC §§31:......
-
LIMITED SCOPE REPRESENTATION WHEN AN APPEARANCE IS MADE AND THE ETHICS OF LAWYERING.
...See id. at 559 (emphasis in the original). (281.) Ramirez, 26 Cal. Rptr. 2d at 559. (282.) See Jones v. Feiger, Collison & Killmer. 903 P.2d 27, 29 (Colo. App. 1994), as modified on denial of reh'g (Feb. 2, 1995), rev 'd, 926 P.2d 1244 (Colo. (283.) Id (284.) See id (285.) See id (286.)......
-
Those Who Worry About the Ethics of Negotiation Should Never Be Viewed as Just Another Set of Service Providers - Lawrence J. Fox
...on a lawyer, provided that the authorization is revocable before a settlement is reached." 9. See Jones v. Ferger, Collison & Killmer, 903 P.2d 27, 34 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994). 10. See Restatement of the Law (Third) The Law Governing Lawyers Sec. 33 cmt. c. 11. Restatement of the Law (Third) T......