Jones v. Fullbright
Decision Date | 22 May 1929 |
Docket Number | 537. |
Parties | JONES v. FULLBRIGHT et al. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Henderson County; Cameron F. MacRae Special Judge.
Action by Sallie H. Jones, administratrix c. t. a. of the last will and testament of S. V. Pickens, deceased, and as Commissioner appointed by the court, against C. S. Fullbright and Michael Schenck, executors of the last will and testament of Cornelia S. Pickens, deceased. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Will bequeathing property to wife for life, with power of disposition and directions to sell proceeds remaining at her death, gave life estate only.
Will devising property to wife for life with power of disposition and direction for sale of property remaining at her death held not to permit testamentary disposition of property by widow.
The material facts are admitted. S. V. Pickens died on June 19 1919, leaving a will in which he appointed as executrix his wife, Cornelia S. Pickens, who duly qualified as such on July 28, 1919. On April 26, 1919, S. V. Pickens deposited in the Citizens' National Bank of Hendersonville the sum of $13,194.66, for which he received from the bank four certificates of deposit in the respective sums of $6,679.66 $5,315, $1,000, and $200. Each certificate was in the following form:
Cornelia S. Pickens, as executrix, collected from the bank $13,332.50, the face of the certificates with interest. She claimed one-half this amount ($6,666.25) as her individual property because the certificates were "payable to the order of Self or Cornelia S. Pickens, his wife," and charged herself as executrix with the other half. Out of the half with which she thus charged herself she paid claims against her husband's estate, the costs of administration, $1,000 for the gravestone, $50 as a legacy to John C. Pickens, aggregating $3,819.33, leaving of this fund $2,846.42. She placed this balance together with $1,016.66, which she had received from other securities, with the $6,666.25 which she claimed independently of the will, making a total of $10,529.33. During her lifetime she used all this sum except $3,200, with which she bought 16 shares of the capital stock of the Citizens' National Bank of Hendersonville, at $200 a share, issued in her name.
At the time of his death S. V. Pickens owned 16 shares of the capital stock of this bank, and Mrs. Pickens as executrix caused these shares to be transferred from his name to hers on December 13, 1921. The estate of S. V. Pickens has no other personal property.
Cornelia S. Pickens died January 7, 1928, leaving a will in which the defendants were named as her executors. They qualified on January 10, 1928. In her will she devised and bequeathed real and personal property. The plaintiff qualified as administratrix c. t. a. of S. V. Pickens on November 14, 1928, and was appointed commissioner on January 19, 1929, pursuant to a provision in the fourth item of his will. The fourth and fifth paragraphs of his will are as follows:
The plaintiff contends that the bank stock belongs to the estate of S. V. Pickens, and the defendants contend that it belongs to the estate of Cornelia S. Pickens. Judge MacRae held that the plaintiff in her capacity as executrix and commissioner is the owner of the 32 shares of the capital stock of the Citizens' National Bank of Hendersonville and is entitled to recover them from the defendants. The defendants excepted and appealed.
G. H. Valentine, of Hendersonville, for appellants.
Shipman & Arledge, of Hendersonville, for appellee.
The ultimate question is whether the title to the 32 shares of stock in the Citizens' National Bank of Hendersonville is in the plaintiff as the representative of S. V. Pickens or in the defendants as the representatives of his wife. The answer depends upon the interpretation of the testator's will and the legal significance of the certificates of deposit.
The bank certified that S. V. Pickens had deposited the money and that it was ""payable to the order of Self or Cornelia S. Pickens, his wife." The defendants say (1) that in effect the deposits were made in the names of both the husband and the wife, were payable to either, and upon the death of the husband were payable to the wife without regard to any provision in the husband's will; or (2), if this position is unsound, that the word "or" should be construed to mean "and," thereby giving to the wife a one-half interest in all the deposits.
The appellants cite C. S. § 230, as supporting their first contention; but this section applies only when the deposit is made "in the names of two persons, payable to either, or payable to either or the survivor." The certificates show that the deposits were made, not in the names of two persons, but in the name of S. V. Pickens only. Of more direct interest to the appellants is the question whether the subsequent clause in the certificates converts the deposits into a gift, in whole or in part, to the depositor's wife. S. V. Pickens having made the deposit in his own name is presumed, in the absence of contradictory or inconsistent evidence, to be the owner of the money. It remained his unless his wife obtained title to it or to a part of it by trust, gift, or bequest. It is not contended that a trust was created, but that the depositor intended the certificates, treated independently of his will, as a gift inter vivos to his wife.
In the cases...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Buffaloe v. Barnes
...intention must be consummated by a delivery of, and loss of dominion over, the property given, on the part of the donor. Jones v. Fullbright, 197 N.C. 274, 148 S.E. 229; Nannie v. Pollard, 205 N.C. 362, 171 S.E. 341. complete a gift inter vivos there must be first the intention to give and ......
-
Jones v. Waldroup
... ... depend upon the fact of survivorship. Taylor v ... Smith, 116 N.C. 531, 535, 21 S.E. 202. Since there is ... nothing in public policy. to prevent it, the right should be ... Defendant ... cites in the brief Jones v. Fullbright, 197 N.C ... 274, 148 S.E. 229, and Nannie v. Pollard, 205 N.C ... 362, 171 S.E. 341, both of which cases concern a joint ... checking account at the bank; and there is nothing in the ... evidence in those cases to indicate that the ownership of any ... part of the account had been ... ...
-
Dixon v. Hooker
...that, as she failed to make such disposition, the personal property went to the heirs of the testator's brothers and sisters." In Jones v. Fullbright, supra, it was held that, where property was given and bequeathed by the husband in his last will and testament to the wife, for her natural ......
-
Smith v. Smith, 605
...nothing else appearing. Hall v. Hall, 235 N.C. 711, 714, 71 S.e.2d 471; Nannie v. Pollard, 205 N.C. 362, 171 S.E. 341; Jones v. Fullbright, 197 N.C. 274, 277, 148 S.E. 229; Thomas v. Houston, 181 N.C. 91, 93, 106 S.E. Such deposit does not constitute a gift to the wife. To make a gift inter......