Jones v. Parker

• Court: North Carolina Supreme Court
• Writing for the Court: DAVIS, J.
• Citation: Jones v. Parker, 97 N.C. 33, 2 S.E. 370 (N.C. 1887)
• Decision Date: 16 May 1887
• Parties: JONES and Wife v. PARKER.

2 S.E. 370

97 N.C. 33

JONES and Wife v. PARKER.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

May 16, 1887

Appeal from superior court, Gates county.

Denying a motion for a new trial, based upon affidavits of some of the jurors that they did not concur in the verdict, and by others that they did not understand portions of the charge of the court, and where there is no error assigned in the record, is a matter purely within the discretion of the presiding judge, and will not be considered.

John Gatling, for plaintiff.

No appearance for defendant.

DAVIS J.

This was a civil action tried before SHIPP, J., at fall term 1886, of Gates superior court. There is no error assigned in the record, but a motion was made for a new trial based upon affidavits filed by some of the jurors that they did not concur in the verdict; and by others that they did not understand portions of the charge of the court. Counter-affidavits by other members of the jury were also filed.

The case states that "the court considering the affidavits fully, and acting upon personal knowledge of what transpired in court, in the exercise of discretion, refused the motion." The granting of a new trial when a matter of discretion, as in this case, is purely a subject for the consideration of the presiding judge, and this court has no power to review or control the exercise of his discretion. This is too well...