Jones v. State, s. 88-526
| Decision Date | 01 November 1988 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 88-526,88-371,s. 88-526 |
| Citation | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2439,532 So.2d 1337 |
| Parties | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2439 Larry Lee JONES, a/k/a Genoa Little, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Frank A. Abrams, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Steven T. Scott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HUBBART, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
This is an appeal by the defendant Larry Jones from a judgment of conviction and sentence for burglary of an unoccupied building and third-degree grand theft. The defendant presents two points on appeal, neither of which represent reversible error. We, accordingly, affirm.
First, although the point is far from frivolous as the state maintains, we conclude that, in balance, sufficient circumstantial evidence was adduced below to establish that the defendant was a "lookout" for a codefendant who broke into the house herein and committed the charged theft. See T.J.T. v. State, 460 So.2d 508, 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Rosson v. State, 319 So.2d 64, 65 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); Jefferson v. State, 298 So.2d 465, 466 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); cf. Pack v. State, 381 So.2d 1199, 1200 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). Second, no error is presented by the trial court's refusal to grant the defendant's motion for mistrial after a police officer testified that the defendant had a pair of scissors in his hand when arrested, which testimony violated a prior trial court order excluding such evidence. This testimony, although arguably irrelevant, was not so prejudicial that a mistrial was called for; moreover, the further testimony that the officer considered the scissors a weapon was elicited by the defendant on cross examination so that the error, if any, was entirely invited by the defendant. See Stanley v. State, 357 So.2d 1031, 1034 (Fla.1974); Sullivan v. State, 303 So.2d 632, 635 (Fla.1974), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 911, 96 S.Ct. 3226, 49 L.Ed.2d 1220 (1976); Stanley v. State, 357 So.2d 1031, 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 364 So.2d 891 (Fla.1978); Lowman v. State, 353 So.2d 652, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fernandez-Carballo v. State, FERNANDEZ-CARBALL
...not the state, offered such deposition in evidence and consequently any claimed error here was entirely invited. Jones v. State, 532 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Stanley v. State, 357 So.2d 1031, 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 364 So.2d 891 Finally, the defendant was given adequate wri......
-
Lindeman v. State, 89-1562
...Lauri Waldman Ross, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Before HUBBART, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Jones v. State, 532 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Holley v. State, 523 So.2d 688 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Kelley v. State, 486 So.2d 578 (Fla.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 871, 107......
-
A.M. v. State, 88-2569
...jewelry case supported finding that juvenile was guilty of aiding and abetting commission of grand theft); see also Jones v. State, 532 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (defendant circling neighborhood and giving "thumbs-up" signal to codefendant sufficient evidence to affirm conviction as aid......