Jones v. State
Decision Date | 17 July 1902 |
Citation | 42 S.E. 271,115 Ga. 814 |
Parties | JONES v. STATE (two cases). |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. The supreme court will dismiss the writ of error based upon a bill of exceptions, assigning error upon the overruling of a demurrer to an indictment, when it appears that after such bill of exceptions had been sued out a nolle prosequi was, in the court below, entered upon the indictment.
2. It does not follow, because a criminal case was called for trial on the day after that upon which the bill of indictment was returned, that the accused had not had sufficient opportunity to prepare for his defense, when it appears that he had for some time been under indictment for the identical offense charged in that indictment, and that it in fact took the place of a previous indictment upon which a nolle prosequi had been entered.
3. An indictment good in substance will not be quashed upon a demurrer which in mere general terms characterizes it as "vague, uncertain, and indefinite," without pointing out any particulars in which it is so.
4. The words, "contrary to the laws of said state, the good order, peace, and dignity thereof," appearing at the conclusion of an indictment, though apparently, in their grammatical connection, referring to a preceding statement therein not relating to the commission of the act constituting the offense charged, will be held to apply to that act.
5. A special plea in abatement of an indictment, alleging the pendency against the accused of another indictment for the same offense, is certainly not good when the plea itself discloses that a nolle prosequi has been entered upon the former indictment.
Error from superior court, Dooly county; B. D. Evans, Judge.
Lee B Jones was convicted of embezzlement, and brings error on two bills of exceptions. Writ of error in one case dismissed, and judgment affirmed in the other.
Allen Fort, W. J. Grace, and Anderson, Anderson & Thomas, for plaintiff in error.
F. A Hooper, Sol. Gen., for the State.
Lee B. Jones was indicted, in Dooly superior court, for embezzlement. On the 13th day of March, 1902, during the February term of that court, a demurrer to the indictment, which he had filed, was overruled; and thereupon he sued out a bill of exceptions in which the only assignment of error was upon the refusal of the trial court to sustain the demurrer. This bill of exceptions was certified on the 20th day of March, 1902. On the 25th day of that month, a special term of Dooly superior court was convened for the trial of criminal cases, and the solicitor general, with the consent of the presiding judge, entered a nolle prosequi upon the indictment, and immediately presented the case anew to the grand jury in session at this special term, who on that date returned a new indictment for the same offense.
This indictment reads as follows:
It does not...
To continue reading
Request your trial