Jones v. State

Decision Date27 May 1931
Docket NumberNo. 14361.,14361.
Citation39 S.W.2d 76
PartiesJONES v. STATE.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from District Court, McLennan County; Richard I. Munroe, Judge.

Roscoe Jones was convicted of murder, and he appeals.

Reversed, and cause remanded.

John B. McNamara, of Waco, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is murder; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for twenty years.

Appellant was employed as an automobile mechanic in a garage operated by his father. He had sold an automobile to Jesse Cline and Clarence Cline on the deferred payment plan. At the request of the Cline boys, appellant had gone to the home of Ab. Cline, their uncle, where Jesse Cline and Clarence Cline resided, for the purpose of collecting a deferred payment on the car. Upon his arrival, appellant was invited into the house, where he drank some home brew with the Cline boys. While in the house it was agreed between those present that Jesse Cline and Clarence Cline would deliver the automobile to appellant because they were unable to meet their payments. All of the discussion between the Cline boys and appellant about the car was good-natured and amicable. The parties remained in the house from about 11:30 a. m. until 3 o'clock in the afternoon. It had been raining for several hours. After the rain stopped, appellant, Ab. Cline, Jesse Cline, and Clarence Cline left the house. Shortly after they had gone into the yard Ab. Cline remonstrated with appellant and one of the Cline boys for urinating near the house. Appellant and the Cline boy immediately desisted and went to a nearby outhouse. The automobile which the Cline boys were delivering to appellant had to be pushed from the yard. Appellant and the Clines undertook to push the automobile into the road in order that appellant might tie it behind his truck. While the parties were engaged in pushing the car from the yard into the road, it became stuck in a small ditch. Jesse Cline then went to the home of Lloyd McCollum, deceased, which was about 200 yards away. A few minutes after Jesse Cline went to McCollum's house, Ab. Cline stated that he would go to the home of deceased and get a chain to pull the car out of the ditch. Deceased and a Mr. Chamberlain returned with Ab. Cline and Jesse Cline.

The community in which Cline lived was known as Bull Hide. As soon as deceased approached appellant, he said to appellant, in substance, that it looked like he had come down there to impose on the Cline boys and run Bull Hide. Appellant replied that he was not trying to run over anybody but trying to push his car out of the ditch, and asked deceased if he would help push the car out. Deceased replied: "No, the law will have to push the car out of the ditch; it is the law's business to take the car." Appellant said: "Well, if you feel that way about it you had better go back to your home." Ab. Cline then asked deceased to assist in trying to get the car out of the ditch, and deceased replied: "Well, I will help you (meaning Ab. Cline), but I will not help him (meaning appellant)." After an unsuccessful effort to get the car out of the ditch, deceased walked to the automobile and began to clean his shoes off on the running board. Some of the witnesses said deceased was using a stick, some said he was using his knife, and another witness said that he was scraping his foot on the running board of the car. While deceased was thus engaged, according to appellant's testimony, Ab. Cline told appellant to get his car out of his yard, and undertook to pick up a piece of iron pipe three or four feet long lying on the ground near the car. Appellant told him not to pick the piece of pipe up. Cline did not pick up the pipe, but said to deceased as he (Cline) approached appellant: "Mack, must I hit him?" Deceased replied: "I believe I would." In the meantime one of the Cline boys walked behind appellant, and appellant said to him "Now don't you all try to gang on me." State's witnesses testified that Ab. Cline did not pick up a piece of iron pipe. According to their version, just as deceased told Cline that he believed he would hit appellant if he were Cline, appellant called deceased a dirty s____ of a b____. Appellant testified that he did not use the epithet, but that it was used by deceased toward him. Deceased told appellant that nobody was afraid of him (appellant); that he might have a gun but he did not have the courage to use it. Deceased advanced rapidly toward appellant, with his hands clenched. Appellant testified that he thought deceased had a knife in his right hand. State's witnesses testified that deceased's hands were clenched, but that he had no knife. As deceased advanced on appellant, appellant pulled his pistol and fired when deceased was within three or four steps of him. State's witnesses testified that the pistol was elevated and the shot passed over deceased's shoulder. Appellant testified that he fired for the purpose of trying to stop the advance of deceased, and that he had no intention of hitting him. Deceased continued to advance upon appellant. When appellant fired the second shot, deceased was close to him. This shot took effect. Deceased turned and walked away, and appellant did not attempt to fire another shot. After walking some fifteen or twenty steps, deceased fell to the ground, and died in a short time. Deceased's wife came running to the scene of the shooting and requested that some one get a doctor. Appellant testified that he told her he would get a doctor as soon as he could get his car cranked. State's witnesses denied that appellant made this statement.

There had been no previous trouble of any character between appellant and deceased; neither had there been any...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Ex parte Rogers
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • May 11, 1982
    ... ... sole discretion in granting commutation of time of those prisoners in his custody serving jail terms in the county jail." (Emphasis added.) State ex rel. Vance v. Clawson, 465 S.W.2d 164, 168 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denied sub nom. Pruett v. Texas, 404 U.S. 910, 92 S.Ct. 226, 30 L.Ed.2d 182, ... ...
  • Ex parte Daniels
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • January 14, 1987
    ... ...         John B. Holems, Jr., Dist. Atty. and Edward D. Porter, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State ...         Before the court en banc ...         McCORMICK, Judge ...         This is ... ...
  • Fambro v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 28, 1941
    ...death or serious bodily injury. The remaining cited cases, Holland v. State, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 439, 39 S.W.2d 35, and Jones v. State, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 458, 39 S.W. 2d 76, we do not deem to be in point Art. 1224, P.C., herein quoted, does not arise as a defense in every case of homicide where a fat......
  • Walker v. State, 23496.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • November 27, 1946
    ...of provoking the difficulty is not raised by the evidence and the charge on the subject should not have been given. See Jones v. State, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 458, 39 S.W.2d 76; Johnson v. State, 67 Tex.Cr.R. 441, 149 S.W. 165. The facts merely raised the issue as to who began the difficulty. Under ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT