Jones v. State

Decision Date25 May 2000
Docket NumberNo. SC99-37.,SC99-37.
Citation759 So.2d 681
PartiesLloyd M. JONES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Lloyd M. Jones, Miami, Florida, Petitioner, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Mark Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, Florida, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Jones v. State, 747 So.2d 982 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), in which the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed Lloyd M. Jones' violent career criminal sentence based on its prior decision in Higgs v. State, 695 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). In so affirming, the Jones court certified conflict with the Second District Court of Appeal's decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on our decision in State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999), we quash that portion of the decision below that affirmed petitioner's violent career criminal sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect on April 15, 1996, the date on which Jones committed the underlying offense in this case.1See Thompson, 750 So.2d at 649

(remanding for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect at the time the defendant committed her offenses).

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

WELLS, J., dissents.

1. We note that Jones has standing to raise a single subject rule challenge to chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, in light of our decision in Salters v. State, 758 So.2d 667 (Fla.2000). Further, we decline to address Jones' ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim here, as the Third District fully addressed that claim in the decision below and the claim clearly is outside the scope of the certified conflict before us. See, e.g., Ross v. State, 601 So.2d 1190, 1193 (Fla.1992)

.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Jacobs v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • June 24, 2004
    ...decision and not ineffectiveness of counsel. See Jones v. State, 747 So.2d 982 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), quashed in part on other grounds, 759 So.2d 681 (Fla.2000). Under rule 3.850, a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing unless the motion and record conclusively show the defendant is ......
  • Jacobs v. State, 3D01-573.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 14, 2001
    ...decision and not ineffectiveness of counsel. See Jones v. State, 747 So.2d 982 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), quashed in part on other grounds, 759 So.2d 681 (Fla.2000). Under Rule 3.850, a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing unless the motion and record conclusively show the defendant is ......
  • Jones v. State, 3D01-322.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 14, 2001
    ...Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GREEN, JJ. On Petition For Belated Appeal SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge. As a result of Jones v. State, 759 So.2d 681 (Fla.2000), Jones was resentenced in the circuit court on October 11, 2000. It is admitted that Jones was not present at the resentencing an......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT