Jordan v. Equity Properties and Development Co., 95-1056
| Decision Date | 01 November 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. 95-1056,95-1056 |
| Parties | 20 Fla. L. Weekly D2450 Susan JORDAN, Appellant, v. EQUITY PROPERTIES AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Boone & Davis and Michael S. Davis, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant.
Wolpe, Leibowitz & Brotman and George L. Fernandez, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and GERSTEN, JJ.
In this action for negligent infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff, Susan Jordan, appeals a final order granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
Ms. Jordan was the manager of a retail store located in The Mall at 163rd Street (Mall). In May of 1993 Ms. Jordan was walking to a bank located in the Mall to make the store's daily deposit. On the way there, an assailant ran towards her with a gun pointed at her. With the assailant within inches of her, Ms. Jordan, in what she characterized as a reflexive motion, hit the assailant in the chest and face with the deposit bag. Both the assailant's gun and the deposit bag fell. Simultaneously, the assailant and Ms. Jordan stumbled backward. After a moment, the assailant grabbed the deposit bag and ran off with it.
In July of 1994 Ms. Jordan filed this negligence action against Equity Properties and Development Company (Equity), the owner of the Mall. Equity filed a motion for summary judgment and argued that the plaintiff's failure to satisfy the "impact rule" barred her claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress. The trial judge granted Equity's motion for summary judgment and this appeal followed.
Recently, our Supreme Court reaffirmed the impact rule and stated it as follows: "In essence, the impact rule requires that before a plaintiff can recover damages for emotional distress caused by the negligence of another, the emotional distress suffered must flow from physical injuries the plaintiff sustained in an impact." R.J. v. Humana of Florida, Inc., 652 So.2d 360, 362 (Fla.1995) (internal quotations and citations omitted) (emphasis added). It is uncontroverted that Ms. Jordan did not suffer any physical injuries as a result of her encounter with her assailant. Therefore, it was entirely proper for the lower court to grant Equity's motion for summary judgment.
Accordingly, the order under review is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Hagan, 98-1463.
...Health Trust, 651 So.2d 673 (Fla. 1995); Brown v. Cadillac Motor Car Division, 468 So.2d 903 (Fla.1985); Jordan v. Equity Properties & Dev. Co., 661 So.2d 1307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). In Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Cox, 481 So.2d 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), the court ruled that a plaintiff cou......
-
Willis v. Gami Golden Glades, LLC.
...sued for the revelation of confidential student communications), review granted, 924 So.2d 812 (Fla.2006); Jordan v. Equity Properties & Dev. Co., 661 So.2d 1307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (no impact where the victim of a robbery hit the assailant with a deposit My good friend also suggests that th......
- Beasley v. State
-
Ruttger Hotel Corp. v. Wagner, 96-1122
...had touched and drawn blood from the plaintiff. 652 So.2d at 360. Similarly, this Court found no impact in Jordan v. Equity Properties and Dev. Co., 661 So.2d 1307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), where the victim and her assailant fell to the ground after the victim hit the assailant with a bank deposi......