Jordan v. Harrison, 1606

Decision Date11 December 1990
Docket NumberNo. 1606,1606
Citation303 S.C. 522,402 S.E.2d 188
CourtSouth Carolina Court of Appeals
PartiesVicki T. JORDAN, Respondent, v. James M. HARRISON, Appellant. . Heard

Sally G. Calhoun, Greenville, for appellant.

Kenneth C. Porter and Robert M. Rosenfeld, both of Porter & Rosenfeld, Greenville, for respondent.

SHAW, Judge.

In this family court action, the trial judge held appellant, James M. Harrison, in contempt for failing to pay child support. Harrison was sentenced to two months in jail which could be purged upon payment of arrearages of $1,096.95 and a $50.00 fine. Harrison paid that amount and now appeals. We affirm.

The parties were divorced in 1987. At that time, Harrison was earning around $27,000 a year and had agreed to pay $150 per week in child support. On January 4, 1989, Harrison was terminated from his job and remained unemployed for five weeks. 1 He made regular support payments until he lost his job. Harrison testified he found another job but it paid only $6.40 an hour, substantially cutting his income. Mrs. Jordan filed an action for contempt against Harrison for failure to pay child support which was heard before Judge Myers on February 13, 1989. Judge Myers found Harrison in contempt but imposed no sanctions and ordered the $850 arrearage held in abeyance until further order of the court.

On March 7, 1989, Harrison filed a complaint for a reduction in child support and the purging of all arrearages. On March 29, 1989, another hearing was held on a rule to show cause which resulted in Judge Smith finding that Harrison was in contempt and was in arrears $607.70. On April 20, 1989, Judge Smith issued a bench warrant for Harrison's arrest. On May 1, 1989, Judge Patterson found Harrison in contempt and sentenced him to two months to be purged upon payment of the $1,096.95 arrearage and a $50 fine. On May 2, 1989, Harrison paid the arrearage and the fine. On May 9, 1989, a hearing was held before Judge Fanning for a reduction in child support and extinguishment of arrearages. As a result of this hearing, Harrison's child support obligation was reduced to $76.26 per week and the $850 arrearage that accrued prior to Judge Myers' order was held in abeyance. It is from the May 1, 1989, order of Judge Patterson that Harrison appeals.

Harrison first contends Judge Patterson abused his discretion in holding him in contempt after he had filed his complaint to reduce his support and to purge all arrearages. We have read the record and while Judge Patterson was made aware of the scheduled May 9th reduction hearing, we see no request by...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Taylor v. Taylor
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of South Carolina
    • July 7, 2021
    ...has complied with other portions, there is no justiciable controversy for this court to resolve. See Jordan v. Harrison , 303 S.C. 522, 524, 402 S.E.2d 188, 189 (Ct. App. 1991) ("[When] one held in contempt for violation of a court order complies with the order, [the] compliance renders the......
  • Aldridge v. Taylor
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of South Carolina
    • July 7, 2021
    ...Mother has complied with other portions, there is no justiciable controversy for this court to resolve. See Jordan v. Harrison, 303 S.C. 522, 524, 402 S.E.2d 188, 189 (Ct. App. 1991) ("[When] one held in contempt for violation of a court order complies with the order, [the] compliance rende......
  • Cannon v. Ga. Attorney General's Office
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • May 2, 2012
    ...of the proper amount of attorneys' fees is now moot.” In support of his argument, Cannon primarily cites Jordan v. Harrison, 303 S.C. 522, 524, 402 S.E.2d 188, 189 (Ct.App.1991) (“[W]here one held in contempt for violation of a court order complies with the order, his compliance renders the......
  • Crabtree v. Crabtree
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of South Carolina
    • December 13, 2017
    ...... complied with the contempt order by paying certain medical. bills); Jordan v. Harrison, 303 S.C. 522, 524, 402. S.E.2d 188, 189 (Ct. App. 1991) (finding the issue of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT