Jordan v. Phillips & Crew Co.
Decision Date | 23 June 1900 |
Citation | 29 So. 831,126 Ala. 561 |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Parties | JORDAN ET AL. v. PHILLIPS & CREW CO. ET AL. |
Appeal from chancery court, Henry county; Jere N. Williams Chancellor.
Bill by H. C. Jordan and others against Phillips & Crew Company and others to recover certain realty, and for an accounting as to the profits. From a decree for defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
The bill in this case was filed by the appellants, H. C. Jordan J. S. Jordan, J. J. Jordan, A. P. Jordan E. Lee Jordan, E. B Jordan, and F. Rosa Simonton. The bill avers that on August 7, 1892, Junius Jordan became seised and possessed, as trustee, of certain lands, which are specifically described in the complaint, under a deed of conveyance executed on that day; that in this deed of trust the complainants were named as beneficiaries and cestuis que trustent; that upon the execution of said instruments the said Junius Jordan went into possession of the said lands described in said bill, and used them as such trustee until June 27, 1893, when Junius Jordan, as such trustee, unlawfully, and in violation of his trust, and contrary to the interest and rights of the cestuis que trustent, sold said property conveyed to him in the deed of trust to the Phillips & Crew Company, for the purpose of paying an antecedent debt due from the Phillips & Crew Company to Junius Jordan; and that the complainants, as said trustees under said deed executed to Junius Jordan, have never received any compensation whatever for the divestiture of the title and the execution of the deed to the Phillips & Crew Company. It was then averred that Junius Jordan died on June 4, 1893. The Phillips & Crew Company were made parties defendant. The prayer of the bill was for an accounting to ascertain what, if any, of rents, incomes, or profits from said lands may be due from the respondents to the complainants, and that upon the final hearing the chancellor will decree that the complainants are entitled to the lands described in the bill, and will order the title thereto devested out of the respondents and invested in the complainants. The trust deed alleged in the bill to have been executed to Junius Jordan, as trustee, was attached to the bill as an exhibit, and, after naming the state and county was in words and figures as follows: etc. This deed was signed by J. Jordan & Co., Junius Jordan, F. Rosa Simonton, and J. H. Simonton. The deed was filed for record in the probate court of Henry county on August 18, 1892. To this bill the defendants demurred upon several grounds, which may be summarized as follows: (1) The complainants have an adequate remedy in a court of law. (2) Said bill shows on its face that, if complainants have any remedy, it is by means of an action...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Henderson v. Henderson
...v. Cole, 89 Ala. 381, 8 So. 72; Huntington v. Spear, 131 Ala. 414, 30 So. 787; Prince v. Prince, 162 Ala. 114, 49 So. 873; Jordan v. Phillips, 126 Ala. 561, 29 So. 831. In such case the statute of uses executes the use by connecting into the legal estate the beneficiary when no ultimate pur......
-
Butler v. Wilson
... ... remedy by ejectment." Cox v. Boyleston, 57 Ala ... 270; Jordan v. Phillips & Crew Co., 126 Ala. 561, 29 ... So. 831 (in equity); Brown v. Hunter, 121 Ala. 210, ... ...
-
Price v. Hall
... ... forum would not suffice. Mardis v. Burns, 222 Ala ... 31, 130 So. 381. As said in Jordan v. Phillips, 126 ... Ala. 561, 29 So. 831, 832, and applicable here: "For the ... recovery of the ... ...
-
Bellamy v. Pitts
... ... turn back except upon strong conviction of error. In the ... briefs for appellant, Jordan v. Phillips, 29 So ... 831, 126 Ala. 567, and Dallas Compress Co. v. Smith, ... 67 So. 289, 190 ... ...