Jordan v. Slaughter

Decision Date01 January 1853
Citation10 Tex. 318
PartiesJORDAN v. SLAUGHTER.
CourtTexas Supreme Court
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

A motion to dismiss a certiorari must be made at the return Term. (Note 61.)

Appeal.

LIPSCOMB, J.

This case was brought into the District Court from a justice's court by a writ of certiorari. The first Term it was continued on affidavit. At the next Term, the certiorari was dismissed on the motion of the plaintiff in the suit who had obtained judgment in the justice's court, from which an appeal was taken to this court. According to the previous decisions of this court, it was too late to move to dismiss the case after there had been a continuance.

The trial ought to have been de novo. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

NOTE 61.--Steinlein v. Dial, ante 268.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Davidson v. Whiteiiill
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • 11 Febrero 1914
    ...some jurisdictions it is held that a motion to quash more properly lies before a return is made (Flournoy v. Payne, 28 Ark. 87; Jordan v. Slaughter, 10 Tex. 318; People v. McCellan, 107 App. Div. 272, 94 N. Y. Supp. 1107), and in Illinois that, it being in effect a demurrer to the petition,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT