Jost v. Lakeland Regional Medical Center, Inc.
| Decision Date | 12 March 2003 |
| Docket Number | No. 2D01-4549.,2D01-4549. |
| Citation | 844 So.2d 656 |
| Parties | Karyen P. JOST, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Arthur Myers, deceased, Appellant, v. LAKELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., a corporation; American Continental Insurance Company, a corporation; Amir Ahmad, M.D. and Amir Ahmad, M.D., P.A., a professional association, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
W.C. Gentry and Corinne C. Hodak, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Raymond T. Elligett, Jr. of Schropp, Buell & Elligett, P.A., Tampa, for American Continental Ins. Co., Appellee.
Tricia B. Valles of Hahn, Morgan & Lamb, P.A., Tampa, for Lakeland Regional Medical Center, Appellee.
No appearance for Appellees Amir Ahmad, M.D. and Amir Ahmad, M.D., P.A.
The alleged spoliation of evidence in a medical malpractice case provides the framework for this appeal. Ms. Jost, in her amended complaint, claimed that Lakeland Regional Medical Center (LRMC) had rendered negligent medical treatment to Arthur Myers and that both LRMC and American Continental Insurance Co. (ACIC) had concealed or destroyed evidence. ACIC moved to dismiss the amended complaint while LRMC moved to dismiss the four counts dealing with the spoliation of evidence. The trial court entered an order granting with prejudice both ACIC's and LRMC's motions to dismiss. We affirm the dismissal, with respect to LRMC, of the four counts of the amended complaint concerning the spoliation of evidence. As to ACIC, while we affirm the trial court's dismissal of the concealment of evidence claims, we reverse the dismissal with prejudice of the destruction of evidence charges and find that the dismissal of those claims should have been without prejudice.
This is not the first time the parties have been before this court. Initially Ms. Jost, then acting as plenary guardian of Mr. Myers, filed a medical malpractice lawsuit alleging that the permanent brain damage suffered by Mr. Myers occurred as a result of the negligence of Dr. Amir Ahmad and LRMC. The case was tried before a jury and resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendants. One of the grounds on appeal was the trial court's exclusion of communications between Dr. Walter Gray, a fact witness called by Ms. Jost, and the risk management officer where Dr. Gray worked. Finding that the trial court committed reversible error in excluding the communications, this court ordered that a new trial be held. Jost v. Ahmad, 730 So.2d 708, 711 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
After remand, but before a retrial could occur, Mr. Myers died. In her capacity as personal representative of Mr. Myers' estate, Ms. Jost filed the amended complaint at issue which presented the same claims for medical malpractice previously asserted. In addition, the amended complaint joined ACIC, the insurer for LRMC, and added the counts for spoliation of evidence against both LRMC and ACIC.
ACIC and LRMC moved to dismiss the spoliation counts arguing, in part, that Ms. Jost had failed to state a cause of action. The trial court dismissed with prejudice the spoliation counts while allowing the medical malpractice charges to go forward. On appeal, Ms. Jost submits that a cause of action for spoliation has long been authorized under Florida law and that it was error for the trial court to dismiss her claims for spoliation. In a recent opinion, this court acknowledged that "[s]poliation is a recognized cause of action in Florida." Townsend v. Conshor, Inc., 832 So.2d 166, 167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). In order to establish a cause of action for spoliation, a party must show:
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases—Report No. 15–01
...780 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) ; Am. Hosp. Mgmt. Co. of Minnesota v. Hettiger, 904 So.2d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) ; Jost v. Lakeland Reg. Med. Ctr., 844 So.2d 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ; Nationwide Lift Trucks, Inc. v. Smith, 832 So.2d 824 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ; Torres v. Matsushita Elec. Corp., 762 So......
-
Green Leaf Nursery v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours
...does not constitute spoliation because such conduct is covered by the litigation privilege. See Jost v. Lakeland Regional Med. Ctr., 844 So.2d 656, 658 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2003) ("Concealment of evidence, however, does not form a basis for a claim of spoliation."); see, e.g., Regal Marble, Inc......
-
Shuck v. Bank of America, NA
...one of its essential elements is contingent upon the occurrence of an event that may or may not occur. See Jost v. Lakeland Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc., 844 So.2d 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (noting that a claim for spoliation of evidence would not ripen until the underlying medical malpractice case h......
-
In re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases — Report No. 18-01
...777, 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006);Am. Hosp. Mbmt. Co. of Minnesota v. Hettiger, 904 So.2d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005);Jost v Lakeland Reg. Med. Ctr., 844 So.2d 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003);Nationwide Lift Trucks, Inc. v. Smith, 832 So.2d 824 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002);Torres v. Matsushita Elec. Corp., 762 So.2d ......
-
Negligence cases
...between the evidence destruction and the inability to prove the lawsuit; and 6. damages. Source Jost v. Lakeland Reg’l Med. Ctr. , 844 So.2d 656, 657 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), rev. dismissed , 888 So.2d 622 (Fla. 2004). NEGLIGENCE CASES §2:120 Florida Causes of Action 2-62 §2:120.1.3 Elements of ......
-
Toward a Theory of Medical Malpractice
...1234–35 (E.D. Ark. 2000). 186 . See PORAT & STEIN, supra note 86, at 167–69. 187 . See, e.g. , Jost v. Lakeland Reg’l Med. Ctr., Inc., 844 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003) (dismissing a spoliation claim as premature when it was brought before the underlying cause of action had been res......
-
Deconstructing damages for destruction of evidence: Martino eradicates the first-party tort of spoliation of evidence.
...the Third District's Bondu opinion. Not quite two months later, on March 12, 2003, in Jost v. Lakeland Regional Medical Center, Inc., 844 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), rev. dism., 888 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 2004), the Second District Court of Appeal "aligned" itself with the Fourth District's Ma......
-
Spoliation of Evidence and Non-Party Witnesses.
...evidence can arise by contract, by statute, or by a properly served discovery request"); Jost v. Lakeland Regional Medical Center, Inc., 844 So. 2d 656, 657 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (concealment of evidence does not give rise to claim for spoliation); Royal & Sunalliance v. Lauderdale Marine ......